Animal Rights And The Dominant Worldview Toward Animals

1890 words - 8 pages

Our world today is becoming less and less aware of the pain and suffering being inflicted on animals. In outcome, animals are becoming even more and more tarred in society. Humans have and is continuing to handle animals as if they are some kind of material goods. This is considered as being immoral, as animals have their own lives, and they think, have feelings, can feel pain, require love, have families, and everything else that humans possess.

The General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. The Declaration sets out “a common standard of achievement” for all people and all nations. Even so the nation have pledged to recognize this declaration, still many people throughout the world do not receive these basic human rights (James 5). Therefore, my question is then hence if human rights are difficult to enforce, what hope is there for animals? What rights should animals have?
This paper will be showing two different worldviews - the dominant and the biocentric worldviews with respect to animal rights. It will explore the moral and ethical issues raised by human superiority over animals. I will argue for the biocentric worldview, in favour of animal rights as I will focus on two main ideas: equality and suffering.
This paragraph will be showing the dominant worldview toward animal rights. There are many philosophers who claim that animals have no such thing as rights since animals can’t suffer and have no equality like humans. First of all, a dominant worldview is human centered (anthropocentric), it focuses on the importance of human beings and states nature has instrumental value (Class notes Oct.16). A French philosopher René Descartes, who supports the dominant worldview, go against animal rights by presenting the idea that animals are incapable of suffering in anyways at all; that they are in fact, “‘unconscious automata’, possessing neither thoughts nor feelings nor a mental life of any kind” (Singer 10). He believes that animals were no more than “complicated biological robots” (BCC 3).
Ilana Mercer holds the same worldview as Descartes, but has different arguments. She argues similarly that there are no rights for animals and that “unlike human beings, animals by their nature are not moral agents. They possess no free will, no capacity to tell right from wrong, and cannot reflect on their actions, while they often act quite wonderfully their motions are merely a matter of conditioning” (2). To support Mercer, Cargile quotes, “a human has as much right to eat meat as a hawk or a fox does” (James 13). He considers that it is quite natural to eat animals and use animal products and that we have no moral qualms about doing so (James 13).

Neil Schulman also holds a dominant worldview and asserts that the ‘animal rights’ movement is relying upon a logical fallacy which is based on commonly restricted premises. The first premise is that “human beings are no different from other...

Find Another Essay On Animal Rights and the Dominant Worldview toward Animals

Animal Testing: Animals and Medicine Essay

1266 words - 6 pages (Cook). However, many technological advances are starting to reduce the need to test on innocent animals. Despite its positive history of its many medical discoveries, animal testing should not be tolerated as it is unethical, costly, ignorant, and because many cheaper and more reliable alternatives have been created. Many people are against animal testing, whereas many people also support animal testing. Many products must be tested before they

Animal Testing and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

1307 words - 5 pages Everyday people are using products not knowing who, what, where, why or how these products are being made from. Many companies are neglecting the use of animal experimentation by the fact that there are alternative ways to test their products without testing them on animals. If alternative methods have been discovered that are more humane and effective, why aren’t companies using them? By using alternative methods to animal testing, products and

Animal rights and the food industry

2852 words - 11 pages ideology, animal rights activism, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals. Ethics & Behavior, 2(3), 141-149.Livingston, A. (2002). Ethical issues regarding pain in animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 221(2), 229-233.Luke, B. (2007). Justice, caring and animal liberation. The feminist care tradition in animal ethics, 125-152.Mosser, Kurt, (2010)- Ethics and Social Responsibility. Bridgepoint Education. http

Animal Rights and Conditions

2402 words - 10 pages concerned. Animals as living creatures, should have rights to protect themselves. If animals don’t have rights to keep them out of harm’s way then they can be easily taken advantage of because they don’t have a voice to be heard. The goal of this research is to bring awareness to the ways animals are used in medical research and cosmetic testing, the conditions they face in factory farms, as well as their welfare in slaughter houses, also the rights

Vegetarianism and Animal Rights

2485 words - 10 pages Hindu and Buddhist were advocating a vegetarian diet for ethical reasons. One of the most important reasons why people decided not to consume meat is a “Do not harm” principle. People should not make animals suffer and experience pain because animals deserve the same level of respect as people. Even though people started to think of vegetarianism and animal rights movements a long time ago, these movements became popular only in the early 1970s. In

Animal Rights and Euthanasia

2022 words - 8 pages animal rights depends seriously on how one views the issue as a whole. Lewis Vaughn writes:"The traditional attitude toward animals is that they are merely resources that humans dispose of as they see fit; animals have instrumental value only. But many reject this traditional view and put forward reasons for supposing that animals have moral status…a suitable candidate for moral concern or respect in its own right" (Vaughn, 564)Therefore

Animal Testing and Mistreatment of Animals

687 words - 3 pages Animal research has played a major role in developing medications and treatments available to humans today, without animals, doctors would not be able to introduce these medications and treatments without initially testing them for safety. My wife has a son who was born without the pulmonary artery and because of animal research; he was provided another outlet for survival. In his first five days of life, he underwent surgery. It was the

Animal Farm: The Animals Bad Memories

936 words - 4 pages Animal Farm: The Animals' Bad Memories      Almost all the animals had a very bad memory so they were not able to remember things of major signifigance. After a little while the pigs would mention the past and the animals would not remember what had happened so they would agree with the pigs. The the battle of cowshed, snowball was a very herioic animal in that battle but Neapolean said that that was not true that

The History and Purpose of The Animal Rights Movement

977 words - 4 pages As of today PETA is one group that is helping animals in barbaric situation like that of professional research laboratories. In these laboratories, the staff treats animals inhumanly where chemicals are poured onto the animal causing burns and sores. According to answers.com, animal rights are the rights to humane treatment claimed on behalf of animals, especially the right not to be exploited for human purposes. This movement in America traces

Animal Rights across the World

1851 words - 7 pages paragraph will be showing the dominant worldview toward animal rights. There are many philosophers who claim that animals have no such thing as rights since animals can’t suffer and have no equality like humans. First of all, a dominant worldview is human centered (anthropocentric), it focuses on the importance of human beings and states nature has instrumental value (Class notes Oct.16). A French philosopher René Descartes, who supports the dominant

The Rights of Testing on Animals

1190 words - 5 pages information proves that there is alternative ways to test on animals and that there is not much to help these animals by their rights that they have earned from the AWA where they have been trying to save countless experiments from happening. Yes, animal testing is helping humans get better results on our needs for medication, hygiene, and cosmetics. “Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways

Similar Essays

The Other Animals An Essay About Animal Rights

1014 words - 4 pages and deserve more as far as rights are concerned solely on the premises of their own self propelled thoughts.Peter Singer writes that, by some, sexual discrimination is the last known form of discrimination that should be recognized by people. While I agree that animals do deserve rights that entail being treated fairly and humanely, the line does have to be drawn at some point. If people were to treat all animals as we treat each other then many

Animal Rights: Laws That Protect Animals

2275 words - 10 pages Dating back to the 1600’s, animal rights have been trying to come fully apart of our society. Every state in the United States has a law to protect animal rights but they are not all equal, therefore, animals are still in danger. They are in danger of many different ways that include abuse, testing, and fighting. Animal rights do not only affect animals, but humans also. Those who abuse animals can abuse other humans. It is understood that

Animal Rights Do We Really Love Our Animals?

2433 words - 10 pages issue of Animal Rights is in fact an issue of one's moral code. To define the morality and ethics, this paper will refer to Ayn Rand's definition taken from the book, The Virtue of Selfishness. Rand describes itthis way, "It is a code of values to guide a man's choices and actions that determine the purpose of his life" (Rand 13). Can the common animal lover really love animals that much and is it in their moral code to protect the living? Maybe

Do Animals Have A Say?: Comparative Analysis Of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs And Proud To Be Speciecist

1437 words - 6 pages The subject of animal testing for human advantages has always been a debatable topic. It is still undecided whether the use of animals for human benefits is morally right. On the other hand it is scientists and researchers who think that animals are good testing subjects because of various reasons such as preventing harmful products or finding cures to diseases. The two essays “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” by Tom Regan and “Proud to be