Animal Testing: Are We Right To Give Them No Rights? (Supports Animal Testing)

1341 words - 5 pages

There is a fine line between working toward a cause effectively and overdoing it. Animal rights activists cross this line time and time again with their outrageous protests attempting to abolish the use of animals in scientific experiments. They don't understand that it is crucial for scientists to carry out these experiments in order for our society to continue improving health wise.We live longer and healthier lives due to the testing of animals. They have allowed for enormous advances in treating and preventing disease and illness. We are now able to eliminate diseases that were once fatal and are able to repair incurable conditions. These advances have also ensured that the drugs being used in the medical field are more effective and safer for our health and environment. Without these advances, our lifespan would be much shorter, our health worse and our environment and country poorer.Due to strict regulations, researchers ensure that the animals' suffering is reduced to an absolute minimum. They make sure that the benefits of the research are weighed against the effects on the animals concerned. It is obvious, however, that there are many people with concerns about the use of animals in scientific procedures. There are numerous organizations, such as the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME), that are currently working to please these citizens by making sure there are no alternatives, like replacing animal use entirely, reducing the number of animals needed, or refine the procedures to minimize suffering. Some organizations are reasonable in their requests, understanding that animal testing is essential, but others would like for it to be completely banned.There are a small group of extremists that use illegal and violent methods in order to stop animal experiments. Instead of making an effort to change the law, they try to have an influence through intimidation, harassment and violence against individuals and law-abiding businesses. They try to frighten individuals, their families and friends, institutions and companies. The Government has attempted to suppress these acts of violence by working with the police to identify new schemes. They have also made it illegal to protest outside people's houses, where the effect is to intimidate or torment an individual.When the extremists fail to frighten company owners, they turn to the company's customers and suppliers.. They try to prevent these businesses from continuing to help their targeted business. These suppliers may be banks, building companies, fuel suppliers and transportation services. Because they target people who are not directly involved in animal research, the police force has difficulty monitoring their activities.Another way the government has attempted to prevent anger among the public, is to make them more openly informed on the use of animals in scientific procedures. It is important for them to realize that, "The number of animal procedures started...

Find Another Essay On Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

Animal Testing Essay

885 words - 4 pages . Violence is the act of inflicting pain on a person or animal with the act of physical movement such as punching or kicking, and we hear the news of a man abusing his wife with violence from time to time. Researchers do not kick or abuse animals during research. They might give them pain with the testing but there is law that limits the pain to stop animals from suffering

Animal Testing Essay

630 words - 3 pages for loyalty; however it has been a very common practice to test household items, cosmetics and pharmaceutical products on animals for a very long time. Countless of innocent creatures are killed, or live a maimed life thanks to the endeavors of human scientist who use them to further there research. Millions of animals are experimented on and killed in laboratories in the U.S. every year. In order to preserve the life of valuable animal testing

Animal Testing

1532 words - 7 pages rights. It is extremely inhumane and unethical. It is necessary for organizations to put a halt to animal testing because it is not right and just to treat animals this way. People would never torture or test medicines or beauty products on other people, so why is it legal to test them on animals. Animal testing should be illegal because of its vile effects. It is not acceptable to treat animals with absolutely no dignity and respect for self

Animal Testing - 640 words

640 words - 3 pages Cruelty to Animals Act in 1867. As there were scientists who argued that animal testing is required for scientific research, the act made it obligatory to follow rules as the scientists were experimenting on animals. In my opinion, it is pointless and cruel to be testing products on animals as they have done no harm to us, and we should respect them in the same manner. Also, if testing products on animals is so unreliable, why do we do it? I

Animal testing

850 words - 3 pages certain rights that keep them from being experimented on by other people. What we don’t realize is that it is impossible to justify rights for humans, who are a type of animal, and deny rights to non-human animals. Animals have the right to life just as humans have a right to life (Chea). When it comes to what is best for the animals, not using then in laboratory testing has found to be the answers to many problems that have risen within

Animal Testing

1179 words - 5 pages rights and trying to ban testing. These large groups of people can no longer be ignored. Animals should not be forced to participate in trials, because it is unfair that decisions are being made for them. Body paragraph #2: What if animal testing could be completely eliminated? How wonderful would it be, noone or nothing has to suffer. Although some people claim animal testing itself is the most accurate, best way to find cures and

animal testing

1649 words - 7 pages are tested on animals if you are opposed to animal testing. Together, we can make a difference and save all the suffering animals live and give them better places to live. Works Cited Printed book: Dawn, Karen. Thanking the monkey. United States: Basic, 2008. Print. Online books: Clemmitt, Marcia. “Is the treatment of animals improving?: Animal Rights. 8 January 2010. Volume 20. Issue 1. CQ Researcher Clemmitt, Marcia. “Do animals think

Animal Testing - 975 words

975 words - 4 pages argument does not hold up. Alternatives may be useful, but, in some situations, animal testing is still very important in the development of the medical experiments. Vaccines and medication must be thoroughly tested before they are put on the shelves. A poor job cannot be done because a human life could be put at risk. Many animal rights activists claim that we should do away with animal testing due to the fact that the animals suffer. This

Animal Testing

1017 words - 4 pages through testing. These test done to animals have improved the lives of many humans who would have suffered themselves. The testing of laboratory animals is an acceptable form of medical research. Today laboratory animal testing has come a long way and no longer are animals treated cruelly in testing, the welfare of the animals is a major concern. There are many concerns for animals’ safety in laboratory testing. The Research Defense Society

Animal testing

1999 words - 8 pages discovered.To animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer to the question of taking animals lives for scientific purposes is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for "food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on" (PETA). Its stance is that any testing is painful, inhumane, and unnecessary when alternatives are available

Animal Testing - 1354 words

1354 words - 5 pages gasses. If any animals survive after the tests have been conducted they are usually killed but most of the times the animals die from pain and suffering after the tests are done because no medical attention is given, unless needed for another test. Even though there is a fight against animal testing many countries continue to allow animal testing. In fact most countries allow animal testing to continue. Although cosmetic testing is banned in

Similar Essays

Animal Testing: Are We Right To Give Them No Rights? (Supports Animal Testing)

710 words - 3 pages ), that are currently working to please these citizens by making sure there are no alternatives, like replacing animal use entirely, reducing the number of animals needed, or refine the procedures to minimize suffering. Some organizations are reasonable in their requests, understanding that animal testing is essential, but others would like for it to be completely banned.There are a small group of extremists that use illegal and violent methods in

We Need Animal Testing Essay

2618 words - 11 pages will breakdown once it enters the body. Using the animals allows doctors to know when to give the patient a certain medication and how long it should take for the patient to respond to the medication (About FDA). Animal testing is also used for educational purposes. Many students dissect animals in a science class throughout their years in school. The animals are used so that the students can learn how the body functions. By dissection, the

Animal Testing Wrong Or Right? Essay

2080 words - 8 pages Nobel Prizes involved animal research, including the development of penicillin (mice), organ transplant (dogs), and work on poliomyelitis that led to a vaccine (mice, monkeys)" (Animal Testing). Animal rights groups and critics of the animal model are not sure if animal testing was needed to get these results.One moral basis for a pro-testing stance was reviewed by a British House of Lords report in 2002: "the whole institution of morality

Animal Testing Essay 2223 Words

2223 words - 9 pages -painful to animals. For example, scientist sometimes infect mice with diseases, give them antibiotics, and then kill them once they gotten their results (Stokstad). Now scientist develop new sensors and monitors that can be implanted in an animal that can transmit data to scientist that doesn’t involve no pain to the animal (Stokstad). These new sensors and monitors are non-painful and DNA “chips” are more reliable and versatile then earlier animal