Animal Testing Position Paper

1063 words - 4 pages

Ever since The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in England in 1824 was formed, there have been long running debates on the topic of animal rights. The first societies were formed to protect and maintain human treatment of work animals, such as cattle, horses and house hold pets. Towards the end of the 19th century more organizations were formed, this time to protest the use of animals in scientific experimentation. In today's society groups such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have continued these traditional fights as well as adding new agendas. These new agendas include hunting, fishing, and dissection of animals in science classes.The rights of animals have always been important to me during my life. This is due to the fact that I have had pets for as long as I remember. On this topic I feel as though having domesticated animals in the home is fine as long as proper care is taken of them. As for more controversial issue like animal research and experimentation my views vary. A few years ago I felt that any research or experimentation on animals was inhumane and unjust. However after maturing and becoming more aware of the world, I now feel as though there are definite 'goods' that come from animal research that can not come from doing tests on humans. This view is by no means one sided. I also feel that there are some things being done to animals that just should not happen, such as the testing of cosmetics. In other areas of animal rights like dissection in the classroom I think that as long as the animals died naturally it is fine to use them to further a student's education along with human cadavers. Of course, I hope that animal dissection can become a thing of the past with the advent of new technologies.The rights of animals are watched out for by organizations dating back to the early 1800's. I feel that this is an important step in protecting animals as long as they protest within there legal rights. In order to sum my opinion up animals do have certain rights but if experiments, research, hunting and dissection provide positive increases in knowledge that furthers the existence of the world it is a necessary thing that must be done.Perhaps the biggest and most debated subject dealing with the rights of animals is the use of them in research and experimentation. Very few people would object to the use of animals if human lives were saved as a consequence. However the extremists who do object would do so on a few key points. Firstly, animals which are used are subjected to in humane treatment. This consists of tests such as the LD50, which entails giving an animal a lethal dose of a chemical or drug until 50% of them die. Also, experimenters are subjecting them to wound experiments, radiation experiments and studies on the effects of chemical warfare (PETA). Organizations such as PETA are also opposed to cosmetic testing on animals due to experimenters spraying, injecting, and feeding cosmetics to...

Find Another Essay On Animal Testing Position Paper

Animal Experimentation Essay

889 words - 4 pages brought up good arguments to support their position. Even though they have opposite views of animal testing, both share the similarity of wanting to find cures and treatments for diseases that are life-threatening. For now, animals are used for research and alternatives are being considered and tested. There can be a compromise if the Animal Welfare Act protects all the species used for research, reduce and eliminate pain, and looking for better

Animal Research Is Not Helping Humans

1753 words - 8 pages Animal Research Animals are currently being tested all over the world. They are being tested for things such as cosmetics, prescriptions drugs, and used for scientific testing. It is estimated that over 100 million animals are used for testing. Rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and monkeys are common animals used to test newly developed products. These testing procedures and conditions in which these animal must live are widely scrutinized among

The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

1315 words - 5 pages The Necessities of Animal Experimentation Throughout my paper, I felt as though I was able to give a solid and fair representation of the opposing viewpoint on issue of animal testing. However, it was challenging because I strongly oppose animal testing. The rhetorical analysis played a role in this, because I was required to use the various rhetorical appeals to compose a strong argument. Using the appeals definitely helped in trying

Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessary

1675 words - 7 pages Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessaryIs it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on (People for the Ethical

We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics

1496 words - 6 pages We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics     Jane goes to work everyday at an animal-testing lab. She pours liquids used in eyeliner into the eyes of numerous albino rabbits. The rabbits' eyes are held open with clips so that for the 72 hour test period, the rabbits can't even blink. The rabbits' bodies are in a box so that only their head protrudes. Jane watches the rabbits and records how the rabbits’ eyes react. She observes as the

Should Animals be Used for Research?

1141 words - 5 pages . However, many will argue it is an unethical and inhumane way to treat animals, as science has made tremendous strides in evolution and can change their methods. With that being said, which argument holds more weight, cost and safety, over animal protection? Neither. The correct answer should be results. Is animal testing giving us the accuracy in results that we need? In my research paper, I will argue that animal testing should not be used for

Researching context and perspectives

604 words - 2 pages Research a news story with different perspectives include different online outlets. (approx.500 words)Animal testing is a highly divided subject, with a great deal of passion, emotion and ideas on both sides regarding the ethics of this practice. Generally, the scientific community is strongly in favour of animal testing, and the medical breakthroughs that have occurred as a result of animal testing are also considered reason enough to continue

The Ethics and Limitations of Animal Research

1871 words - 7 pages limitations related to the matter? It appears to be a challenge to find common ground concerning the above questions. This paper will first present the current guidelines of animal research, and what is being done to help preserve the suffering and health animals as much as possible. In order to have a full insight on the matter, it is also needed to present the main methods of animal research. Scientists have used animals in many research projects or

Animal Testing- Is it Good?

2214 words - 9 pages Society states that most of "all medical discoveries in the past 100 years have come because of animal research" (British Royal Society, 2004, p. 1). People all over the world are enjoying a better quality of life because of these advances and developments of new medicines and treatments, which could not have been made possible without the help of animals through testing. By reading this paper, the reader should be able to understand that there are

Human Testing and Organs-on-a-Chip

3283 words - 14 pages In this paper, I will defend the usage of organs-on a-chip in medical research as well as the use of humans as test subjects for bio-medical research. My argument is based on the idea that human testing and organs-on-a-chip can potentially improve the field of medical research by reducing the time-frame for obtaining results in combatting against diseases, epidemics, and pandemics. Firstly, I will outline the deficiencies of animal testing and

Animal testing

1999 words - 8 pages animal testing is appropriate is that there are regulations in place to minimize testing and pain, the alternatives are insufficient for now, and more importantly the information obtained from experimentation is irreplaceable.While animal rights groups such as PETA advocate abolishing all animal testing that inflicts pain on animals, components of testing cite laws and regulations which minimize pain and discomfort. PETA's position is based on the

Similar Essays

Animal Experimation Position Paper (Against)

862 words - 3 pages Animal Experimentation/Vivisection There are many scientific labs in the world that have animals in cages. These animals are not pets, they're underfed, sleep deprived, burned, chemically injected, amputated, tortured half-dead animals. Vivisection (as animal experimentation is sometimes called) is extremely popular among scientists. They think that it's the only way to advance in the medical field, but they don't actually realize what

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

995 words - 4 pages undiscovered yet and one of them is AIDS (Tanir, 2012). Frankie L. Trull once said in his article of Animal Test Research Has Saved Many Human Lives, “[…] fight against cancer has seen 24 significant biomedical advances in the past 30 years. None of them could have occurred without animal research.” Therefore, this paper will discuss the importance of animal testing as well as how it plays its roles in medical field. The Breakthrough in Medical

Animal Testing Essay

975 words - 4 pages performed. The purpose of posting these detailed experiments was to convince the reader that all animal testing is wrong and that it should be abolished. For a minute I questioned my position. But, as I read down the page I realized that these tests were ones that were carried out by cosmetic companies. This is not acceptable to me. I feel that it is fine to test on animals if it might one day save my life or someone that I know. However, I do

The Controversy Over Animal Testing Essay

2148 words - 9 pages testing lab but in our meat industry as well we must start making better choices in our methods. Losing all of Europe as supporters of our market could lead to the downfall of our country (E.U. Animal Welfare). As seen in this paper the debate about animal testing has an assortment of different arguments. It all comes down to personal preference. Believing in animal testing when it comes to medical research is my own personal preference. Because