Common Law In Australia Essay

1090 words - 4 pages

Common law is the law made by judges when deciding a certain case before the court. The reasoning the judge applies becomes a precedent, to be followed by other lower courts in future matters of similarity. This is the basis for the doctrine of precedent. A precedent is either a binding precedent, the reason for a decision of a higher court that must be followed by a court of lower status in the same hierarchy; or a persuasive precedent, meaning a reason for a decision of another court that is not binding, and should only be considered for its persuasive value. It is the role of the judge in the common law system to develop and expand the common law where he or she sees fit. It is paramount for judges to base their decisions on cases on judicial precedents. The system of precedent can only operate effectively if the respective precedents are recorded. From as early as the beginning of the sixteenth century, judges produced significant cases in law reports. This process still occurs today, but is now systemised and is controlled by Councils of Legal Education in each jurisdiction (Williams 1998).

In the Australian legal system, a system of common law (case law), the doctrine of precedent is stare decisis (to go by what has been said), meaning that courts are strictly bound to follow past decisions of courts higher in the court hierarchy. Decisions from other hierarchies, for example, courts located in international jurisdictions, may be used as a form of persuasive precedent, but cannot be binding in an Australian case. The court of ultimate authority in Australia is the High Court of Australia, formed by the Commonwealth constitution. The High Court may hear appeals from the Federal Court of Australia or from respective Supreme Courts of states and territories. Below the High Court in each state and territory is a Supreme Court, followed by a Magistrates’ Court. In larger states, another court may fall between these two courts. All courts below the Supreme Court are bound to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of that particular state. The doctrine of precedent provides for a degree of predictability and consistency that makes a judge’s ruling more straightforward, as like cases are treated alike.

While the duty of law-making is that of the Commonwealth and state parliaments, judges have no such authority. Judges can only create laws by means of case decisions. The reason for a particular decision in a case is known as the ratio decidendi, which in turn forms a binding precedent. Statements that are only taken into consideration as persuasive precedent are classed obiter dicta (statements by the way). Whilst the doctrine of precedent provides for certainty and consistency in legal decisioning, there are several disadvantages. The most prominent of these for a judge is that he may be forced to follow a ruling of a higher court based on binding precedent that may seem unjust in the circumstances. Rules may continue to be considered until...

Find Another Essay On Common Law in Australia

The History of English Common Law in Hong Kong

833 words - 3 pages , the writs became formalized so all the arguments in civil matters became more determinable by the Common Law then by the local custom. Moreover, the Norman King started the feudalism; it means all the land was owned by the King. No people except the King had rights to own a piece of land. As a result , all disputes concerning the title to land were removed from the local system.Equity LawAt the beginning of the writ system developed, the Common

The Division Of Law-making Powers In Australia

1266 words - 5 pages supreme law making power was to create the Senate in the Federal Parliament. The Senate is a States house with an equal number of representatives from each State, regardless of population, and it can easily veto (reject) any Bill proposed by the Commonwealth Parliament. This was important because even though it was the Commonwealth Parliament, the states could still have a major voice.In 1942 World War Two was a major issue in Australia. The

Administrative Law in Australia -- Notes on Natural Justice

7990 words - 32 pages that the party affected has a right to be heard. Cooper -no requirements that party be heard, common law will supply natural justice such that party can be heard NOT limited to cases where rights are affected, but extended to where interests or privileges are affected. The considerations in deciding this case included 3 issues 1) FAI regarded the renewal of license as right because they had a legitimate expectation. A person is

A comparative view of contract in civil law and common law

1720 words - 7 pages which was later adopted in the U.S, Australia and other British Commonwealth countries, that is based on precedent instead of statutory laws. Precedent is created by the judges in case of there is no authoritative statement of the law.In common law, the key elements of a legally binding contract are :Offer. The indication by one person to another of his willingness to enter into a contract, with him on certain terms and condition.Acceptance. The

Suggestions on reform of the law of rape in South Australia

1602 words - 6 pages IntroductionThe law of rape in South Australia is governed by the common law and the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 SA. Recently, there have been inquiries as to the low conviction rate for sexual assault offences (1.8 per cent of reported rape cases against adult women resulted in convictions in 2002), which might indicate the insufficiency of law in this area .There are many reasons for the low conviction rate. Among all, emphasis will be

How can the corporations law in australia be changed to prevent another HIH collapse?

3375 words - 14 pages cross boarder insolvency. In 1997 the United Nations Commission on Trade Law adopted the Model Law on Cross-Boarder Insolvency (UNCITRAL) covering both corporate and personal insolvencies. Australia, through CLERP has released a discussion paper exploring the adoption of the UNCITRAL.Auditor IndependenceOne of the major areas of concern is the question of auditor independence. In the case of HIH, two board members were ex-partners of Arthur

Torts law Essay - Answering the questions are remedies available to people infected with AIDS in Australia

2418 words - 10 pages Director general of the Department of Health pursuant to the Health (Infectious Diseases) Regulations 2001 (Vic). On the basis of the facts of your case, I forward to you my advice and subsequent recommendations.DutyThere is no question as to whether a duty of care was owed to Michael in this case. As the professional relationship you have with Michael (of which this case is concerned with) is that of a doctor and patient. "The law imposes on a medical

Trading law in Australia

1165 words - 5 pages leader Fred Nile, Michael West and Take The Time organization. They both have many common points of view such as personal leisure, work and family balance and the fairness in the roaster which may lead to the unfair dismissal, especially to casual employee on this day. They also afraid that the situation will get worse that the government may consider adjust restricted trading hours on the rest four days including Anzac Day, Christmas Day, Easter


2560 words - 10 pages Conqueror invaded England in 1066. By this means the Law in England became known as common law because it became uniform to all people of England. Similarly, as law become uniform a hierarchical system of courts formed, this system was adopted by Australia. As well as following the Australian Hierarchy system of courts, Australian courts also follow the decisions of higher courts in England. However, today law tends to be based less on case law and more

The relationship between human rights and common law

2505 words - 10 pages law, and holds much truth given the limited historical existence and operation of international human rights.Much of the common laws recognition of human rights in Australia has been inherited from English common law, with the most notable developments being the Magna Carta 1215, and the Bill of Rights 1688, which bore resemblance to the modern human rights provisions .The traditional position of the courts in relation to the use of

Law and welfare of society

1729 words - 7 pages IntroductionWhere does Australian law come from? This essay looks at how Australian law originated. The past and the present is explored which provides an insight into the hierarchy of laws within Australia specifically the Commonwealth law, the individual State laws and common law. The last part of the essay explains the differences between two common classification of laws; civil and criminal law.The HistoryThe law in use in Australia is

Similar Essays

Common Law In Australia: The Tort Of Negligence

9095 words - 36 pages wet supermarket floor. It had been a rainy day and in consequence of the foot traffic the floor had become moist. Held, on appeal, that an occupier, according to common law, had duty to take reasonable care. 'The fact that the Zaluzna was a lawful entrant upon the land of the Aus. Safeway establishes a relationship between them which of itself suffices to give rise to a duty on the part of the appellant to take reasonable care to avoid foreseeable

Modern Law In Australia Essay

1952 words - 8 pages P, 2013). The law and legal system around the world has developed throughout history to the point that there are many different categories and sub categories of law. In modern day Australia, the legal system has been modelled after the English system. This is a combination of statute and common law. Australia adopted these laws from England upon colonisation, when Captain Phillip declared the land ‘terra nullius’ claiming it under England

Contract Law In Australia Essay

2897 words - 12 pages here is whether the gallery owes any liability to Client B.It is an established common law principle that where a party sustains a loss by reason of breach of contract, he or she is to be placed in the same position as if the contracts had been performed. This means the law protects the plaintiff's expectation of receiving the defendant's performance. Generally this approach will be reflected by awarding damages for lost expectation, that is, the

Criminal Conspiracy In Historical Common Law

1371 words - 5 pages Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law The law of conspiracy is considerably more complex and uncertain than it need be because the statutory reform of the area largely contained in Part I of the criminal law Act 1977 was only partial. As a result, there are now two types of conspiracy – statutory conspiracies governed by the 1977 Act, and an important but limited range of common law conspiracies, which were expressly retained by the act