Iran's Nuclear Program Essay

1835 words - 8 pages

Background
In the face of uncertain developments in the Iranian nuclear program, there are two important aspects to be taken into consideration by the U.S. government. Firstly, there is substantial evidence that the Islamic Republic is on the verge of achieving break-out capability for creating a nuclear device. It is estimated that such a development could happen within the next six months. In the meantime, the election of a new, moderate President of the Islamic Republic H.E. Hassan Rouhani, whose tone and articulated policies (which, undoubtedly, have been endorsed by the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), may create a historic window of opportunity for reaching an agreement on their nuclear program. Additionally, international sanctions imposed by the United Nations and implemented by the trading partners of Iran may also prove to be an effective tool for dealing with the Iranian nuclear crisis.
However, it is important to bear in mind the wider regional context while dealing with this issue. Israel is still skeptical of the possibility of an agreement with Iran and interprets Mr. Rouhani’s recent conciliatory rhetoric and moves as a smokescreen to kill two birds with one stone: to buy time for the final push to acquire nuclear weapons and present a nuclear-armed Iran as a fait accompli, and to scale back sanctions, with the understanding that their reactivation will be, at least, difficult. France is also supporting Israel’s position on this issue.
A similar problem may arise with another regional actor, Saudi Arabia. Any rapprochement between the U.S. and Iran will unnerve the Saudi Kingdom, which views the Islamic Republic as arch-rival and may consider such development as tipping the balance in the region in Tehran’s favor.
Alternative strategies
Two mutually exclusive strategies may be employed by the U.S. in the given situation. One would be to launch a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities to prevent the imminent break-out of the Islamic Republic as a nuclear power. Second strategy, alternatively, could be reaching negotiated agreement with the new leadership in Tehran with a goal of putting their nuclear program under strict, rigorous international monitoring to assure its civilian character. Both of these strategies have pros and cons, which merit closer look for choosing one over the other.
1. Military offensive operation to destroy Iran’s nuclear sites will arguably halt the country’s uranium enrichment program for a few years. This fact alone represents the major positive outcome of the operation. Another argument in favor of such a strike would be the demonstration of an American resolve in dealing with rogue states attempting to acquire nuclear weapons. It will also win the support and praise of the regional U.S. allies such as, Israel and, possibly, Saudi Arabia (and, generally Sunni population of the region).
On the downside, several issues may be identified related to a military operation against Iranian...

Find Another Essay On Iran's nuclear program

A Nuclear-Armed Iran Essay

1749 words - 7 pages in exchange for major concessions on Iran's Nuclear program and the end to any support for terrorism (Posen 376)." The benefit Posen states is that the 'fence sitters' like Russia and China may be more prone to siding with the US because they may think the US has an ulterior motive to overthrow the current government of Iran (Posen 376). He goes on to say that with the bargain on the table, if Iran was to refuse it would simply bolster the

Iran: A Policy to Eliminate the Nuclear Threat

1639 words - 7 pages negotiations with Iran until November of 2013; a concealed deal to alleviate the sanctions aimed at slowing Iran’s nuclear program had been underway for months between the Obama administration and Iran. The discussions were kept hidden, even from America’s closest allies and Congress. This is where the United States’ policy is flawed. The secrecy of these talks contribute to “tensions between the US and France…and with Israel, which is furious about the

Should America attack Iran or stick with Diplomacy?

1283 words - 5 pages There has been an on going dispute with Iran's ambition of building weapons of mass destruction. Many might agree that they too have the right to build the nuclear weapons like most other countries, while others believe it would be a big mistake. With that being said, the question that arises is how should we prevent Iran from building these weapons of mass destruction? There are two sides that have a different approach to this issue. The hard

Smuggling Of Nuclear Material

913 words - 4 pages plutonium and HEC. In 1992 Iran unsuccessfully approached the Ulba Metallurgical Plant and in 1993 three Iranians belonging to intelligence service were arrested in Turkey while seeking to acquire smuggled nuclear material. The CIA, John Deutch estimates: ³ Iran is a couple of years away from producing a nuclear weapon.² Iran's neighbor Iraq continues its nuclear program after being significantly damaged from Operation Desert Storm and continued U.N

Hard Power on Iran

894 words - 4 pages Paper 1 This paper will show that the US and its allies should take a more Hard Power approach when it comes to nuclear program of Iran. The paper will show how Iran cannot be trusted, due to its history of braking its word, and how the deals that we have made so far shows that the world is giving them the ability to create nuclear weapons. Also I will show how the resent agreements mad heave not done enough to stop Iran from gaining nuclear

Iran's Struggle with Modernity

981 words - 4 pages confrontational past of the Shah's ancestors, especially his father Reza Shah who had violently cracked down on the clergy and its most devout supporters in implementing an agenda of forced Westernization prior to World War 2. However, the notion that the Islamic Revolution automatically rejects any outside influence is wrong. Notable examples are the controversial nuclear energy program of Iran and the banking sector which offers financial services of

National Intelligence Estimates (NIE’s)

1119 words - 4 pages confidence that the halt lasted at least several years. (Because of intelligence gaps discussed elsewhere in this Estimate, however, DOE and the NIC assess with only moderate confidence that the halt to those activities represents a halt to Iran's entire nuclear weapons program.) We assess with moderate confidence Tehran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program as of mid-2007, but we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear

The Dragon and the Magi/ An analysis of China

6155 words - 25 pages with difficult decisions.China has to worry about North Korea going nuclear for the same reason that they should fear Iran's nuclear program. If nations are allowed to proliferate outside of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) then what is to stop Japan from proliferating? A nuclear Japan is something that China desperately wants to avoid and aside from the instability a nuclear North Korea would bring to the region, Japan alone is reason

Israel and Iran relations

2428 words - 10 pages “Accusing the US of basically selling out Israel after President Obama has spent the past five years working diligently to stifle Iran's nuclear program is both unfair and also diplomatically unwise. It risks creating a significant rift with Israel's closest and most important foreign ally (and provider of several billion dollars in foreign assistance). Ultimately, no bond is more important to Israel's long-term security than the US-Israel

Islamic Republic of Iran

2309 words - 10 pages economic, while world powers are concerned that Iran will use the program to develop a nuclear weapon. Being able to independently create nuclear power would be beneficial to Iran economically as well as building national prestige and pride in their accomplishment (Fisher, 2014). If world powers allow Iran to develop their nuclear program for the peaceful purpose of energy production, it would alleviate the countries dependency on oil as a source of

The Need for a National Missile Defense Program in the United States

1483 words - 6 pages The Need for a National Missile Defense Program in the United States Several hundred Soviet, nuclear tipped, ballistic missiles streak towards the United States without any form of opposition or challenge to their impeding destruction. The result of a situation like this would be no doubt disastrous, but it is a situation that could very well take place if the United States does not install a national ballistic missile defense program. An

Similar Essays

Iran's Nuclear Program Essay

2415 words - 10 pages justified in pursuing nuclear energy as an alternative energy source, however, we feel that these proposed alternative energy sources will be more effective in Iran’s energy sector prosperity. As a rebuttal, we believe it could be argued that Iran does not need to seek nuclear energy for civilian purposes at all considering their vast amounts of oil and natural gas reserves. Works Cited i Bruno, Greg. "Iran's Nuclear Program." Council on

Iran: A Nation Under Scrutiny Essay

2202 words - 9 pages nuclear weapons must be fully pursued to ensure Iran's survival in a future conflict [3 page 52]. In his last years as president, Rafsjani seemed to at least publicly reverse his former position. In a 1997 CBS interview, when asked about an Iranian nuclear weapons program, Rafsjani replied "definitely not. I hate this weapon." Current President Mohammed Khatami, his foreign minister and the head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization have made

Nuclear Powers In Asia In Need Of Disarmament

1728 words - 7 pages Iran stop its nuclear weapons projects and to force Pakistan and India to agree their existent nuclear weapons will not be used in the event of war.To understand the urgency behind the need for America to become effectively involved in these situations, it is important to look at the backgrounds of each of these conflicts. The base for Iran's nuclear program was planned in 1960 under the sponsorship of the United States (Iran WMD 3). A few years

Iranian Politics Essay

2423 words - 10 pages more anti-Western than anti-Soviet. Today, Iran has not had diplomatic relations with the United States since the U.S. severed them in response to the seizure of U.S. diplomats as hostages in 1979.American attitudes toward Iran remain strongly negative, with roughly three-in-four holding unfavorable views. The main issue confronting current Iranian diplomacy in its relations with the West is Iran's nuclear program. Concern about Iran's nuclear