Jury Trial Analysis

1143 words - 5 pages

A jury trial is not to be confused with a bench trial as it often times is. While a bench trial takes places only in front of a Judge who is then tasked with coming to a verdict on his/her own, a jury trial is one that is “composed of members of the community present at the trial to act as the finder of fact” (McGuigan, 2014). The constitutional trial rights that are sanctioned throughout a jury trial is called a trial by jury. This is in the sixth amendment which says that everyone has the right to a fair and speedy trial by an impartial jury. The steps involved in creating a jury for the purpose of carrying out a jury trial will be expressly addressed in this paper. Furthermore, the purpose of this paper will be to discuss, in detail, the steps that are involved in a jury trial which include selection of the Jury, the trial, the Judge’s charge, deliberation, and the verdict.

Selecting the Jury:
The first step in a jury trial is to select and establish a jury; jurors are initially selected from what is called a jury pool and this is essentially a list of all registered voters in the area that are both eligible and acceptable for the purpose of serving as a juror. Depending on the type of case, the size of the jury will vary; it is understood that civil cases will typically employ a jury of six people; misdemeanor cases that are less serious will typically have less than 12 jurors while the more serious cases will have 12 jurors as a requirement. Once a specific group of potential jurors has been selected, each juror will be called for questioning known as voir dire. “Voir dire is the process by which citizens are questioned before being selected to hear actual evidence as jurors” (ABA, 2014).
It is after Voir dire questioning has been conducted that jurors can be dismissed by the just for cause; this would occur in the event that a lawyer believes that a juror might be exhibiting certain prejudices about the case that will negatively affect the courts ability to apply due process. Once challenges for cause have been established, the final phasing out process is peremptory challenges and this is a challenge that “permits a lawyer to excuse a potential juror without stating a cause” (ABA, 2014). Once all of these selection phases have been completed, it is at this juncture that the jurors selected will be sworn in.

The Trial:
The jury plays an integral role during the trial process as it is the job of the jury to listen to all evidence, testimony, and arguments submitted by the prosecuting attorney as well as the defense attorney. It is also during the trial process that the Judge may deliver remarks to the jury that they are to be apply to their decision making process. An example of such would be the Judge telling the jury panel to not take into consideration a piece of information that was shared for one reason or another; if this is done, the Jury is not allowed to use said information for making a determination of guilt or innocence. ...

Find Another Essay On Jury Trial Analysis

The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial

946 words - 4 pages The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial This assignment focuses on how a jury is selected and its role in a criminal trial. The advantages and disadvantages of using a jury to decide the outcome of a criminal case will also be considered. A Jury is chosen at random, by a computer using names on the electoral

Description of a jury trial in an english court, how effective they are and some criticisms

1273 words - 5 pages What is a jury?All cases of serious criminal offences are tried by a jury.-A jury is a panel of 12 people who listen to the evidence presented in a court case and then give a verdict on the guilt or innocence of the person or persons on trial.-The members of the jury are impartial, they don't know anyone in the trial and don't care about the result-Their verdict is based solely on the evidence they have heard.There are also a few civil (i.e. non

A Fair Trial? The Azaria Chamberlain Case (Australia). How did a jury of twelve people come to convict Lindy Chamberlain of her daughter's death? 24/25

2249 words - 9 pages evidence, conflicting interpretations of forensic evidence, questionable evidence by so-called experts, finding an unbiased jury after a trial by media, over zealous policing, and not all available evidence presented at the trail resulted in the guilty judgment.To begin, much of the prosecution's arguments in the Chamberlain trial relied heavily on circumstantial evidence. The Crown had been unable to produce a motive, a murder weapon, a confession

Discuss whether trial by jury should be abolished in the English legal system? Critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the system

2010 words - 8 pages Jury selection is laid down in the Juries Act 1994. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly. The anti jury lobby deems the jury system unpopular the importance of which is considered only overrated. I will

Jury System

561 words - 2 pages There are two methods of determining whether a person being charged with a criminal offense is guilty or not guilty; they can be tried before a judge or before a judge and jury. Each of these methods has its advantages, but in my mind a trial by jury is a better way of determining whether someone is guilty or not. A jury trial includes more than one persons' decision and interpretation of the evidence, it offers a thorough review and analysis of

special needs prisoner

1400 words - 6 pages TRIAL 1The Process of a Trial by Jury<Your Name><Your School><Course Title><Instructor's Name>January 20, 2013AbstractA trial by jury is a fundamental part of the United States Constitutional justice process. It both establishes and upholds the rights of the accused, and seeks to determine the truth in the matter of guilt or innocence. Ideally this is done both correctly and without bias, however this ideal state cannot

Jury Nullification

2169 words - 9 pages support our standpoint on this matter.Jury Nullification was established in English common law, it occurs when a member of the jury has a certainty that the facts that were presented at trial establishes the guilt of the accused, but inevitably votes to acquit. Juries have the right to refuse to apply the law when in regards to the accused, and ignore the judge's instructions when deciding the fate of any criminal case despite the facts that leave

The Sixth Amendment

2656 words - 11 pages The Sixth Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791. It guarantees rights related to criminal prosecutions in federal courts and it was ruled that these rights are fundamental and important. The Sixth Amendment gives the accused the right to speedy and public trial by the impartial jury. The accused has the right to be informed of the nature and reason of accusation and also be confronted with the witness against him as well as obtaining

Jury Nullification

1907 words - 8 pages Jury nullification is when a jury acquits a defendant who it believes is guilty of the crime he is charged (Hickey, 2010. p. 370). This is because the jury chose to ignore the facts of the case and the judge instructions, and based his or her decision on personal opinion. If we are going to allow jury nullification we may as well not take up the tax-payer’s money to even take it to trial. Nullification – The act of making a law null and void

Should TV Cameras Be Allowed In Court? This Essay Was For A Level 300 Pych & Law Class And Looks At The Pros And Cons In How It Affects The Participants In A Trial

1151 words - 5 pages the problem is the backup in American courts turning what should be a speedy trial into a long ordeal. This gives a large gap of time between the accusation by authority and the actual trial to determine guilt. During this time period, television analysts have the power to inflict their theories on a specific case to the minds of the public. This public will eventually be the source of a jury for the trial. If this jury is made up of individuals

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

3619 words - 15 pages consideration to see if harmless error review is appropriate or not in a court case with problems such as the Penry v. Lynaugh (Souter). The problem with the case is not as hard as the opinion that the court gave. The error that happened at the petitioner’s trial was about the flaw in the jury’s instructions: The instructions did not give the members of the jury enough time to look over important evidence of the case. This mistake would not have happened

Similar Essays

A Difficult Trial: Jury Undecided Essay

586 words - 2 pages We the jury find the defendant, Not Guilty! Today is the last day of the trial. We have heard all of the witnesses and now we know that we must deliberate. I know that some of the “witnesses” are liars. Some make valid points and I know without a doubt in my mind that Captain Preston is an innocent man and that his men were provoked. As I listened to the witnesses, here is what I came to believe: The witnesses for the prosecution have very

Jury Essay: Medea On Trial

757 words - 4 pages ' jury-like'. When deliberating, the jury and I could have discused more thoroughly of why some thought Medea was innocent and why others thought she was guilty, rather then just vote and have majority rule the decision. The defense did not use their power to object the prosecutor as much as they probably should have. The jury was talking most of the time during the trial and the judge could have silenced the court more to keep things in order and better the trial.

Trial By Jury And Alternatives To It

4174 words - 17 pages Trial by Jury and Alternatives to It In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not be abolished, we need to know what it is that we are dealing with and what viable alternative or alternatives there are to it. I will take a brief look at the history of the jury trial. I will

The Jury And Its Role In The Courts Of Trial

2023 words - 8 pages The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely