Limit Animal Testing Essay

892 words - 4 pages

Animal testing has always been an important part of scientific and medical advances. Studying the results of just one experiment can provide invaluable breakthroughs leading to cures for patients. If scientists do not experiment on animals, the risky trial runs would have to be conducted on humans. Despite the merits of animal testing though, experimental cats, dogs, and primates face intolerable cruelty inside the laboratory. They have not the means of resisting subjection to the painful and often repeated Frankenstein experiments where scientists injure an animal so that they could test a new drug. Thousands of animals die each year- most of them forced to stay alive many months, limping sickly in their cages while researchers study them before they are put to death. Fortunately though, not all animal case studies resemble torture chambers, and they do not occur as frequently as one may think. To shield the animals from excessive abuse by testing while continuing scientific and medical discoveries' advancement, each animal subject to testing should require a detailed written explanation submitted to and approved by the FDA.As of now, scientists are free to test new drugs and devices on animals without any approval. Their only responsibility is to make sure that the test subjects are "killed in a humane way promptly after the conclusion of the scientific investigation." It is ironic that the law only protects the animals when they are about to die. Before that, researchers are free to conduct any test they want. Some experiments cripple the animal for many months so the scientists have time to make observations while the animal suffers. In one test, a primate was placed in a guillotine-like device with a blunt "blade" designed to break the animal's neck while keeping it alive to test a spinal-cord repairing procedure. Its head remained locked in a vise while its body laid limp on a steel table for eighteen weeks as doctors attempted to "heal" the primate (the procedure was never successful). Doubtless, these animals suffer torturously during prolonged experimentations. What angers many people is that these animals are forced to endure pain because they do not have the means to resist. The only difference between a human and an animal is their inability to say 'no' to forced lab tests. Animals feel and hurt the same way humans do, contrary to the popular belief that they are 'dumb' and 'don't have feelings.' Scientists exploit animals' inability to speak and force them into oppressive lab cages where they are deliberately crippled and eventually killed.Scientists however, see little alternatives to animal testing the way it currently is. For the quantitative researcher, reason rules. The only viable option that would preserve animal rights is to skip animal testing and conduct new...

Find Another Essay On Limit Animal Testing

The Fittest One Must Survive Essay

983 words - 4 pages Over the course of time, animal testing has served as an implement to enhance the life quality of humans. Even the great medic Galen of Pergamon used animals for research which made him become the father of vivisection. According to the article “Should Vivisection be abolished” by Bayard Webster, vivisection “is a surgery on a living organism for experimental purposes.” Furthermore, Niccolo Machiavelli once said, “The end justifies the means

Animal testing should not be conducted

797 words - 4 pages procedures of animals testing are likely to cause pain, discomfort, or even lethal physical harm. No sufficient actions have been done to alleviate the animals’ pain, however, even though the image of a little mouse struggling in a tube is familiar to the general public. In the United States, Animal Welfare Act has been applied to animal testing, but it merely regulates the cage size, sanitations, and food and water. It does not necessarily limit the

Using Animals in Research and Experimentation

851 words - 4 pages year. All research and experiments must be approved before being able to conduct the tests and before the experiments can be started. The UK has some of the highest standards of laboratory welfare in the world. There is legal requirements that limit the number of animals that can be used for testing. Animal research can only be done in the UK where there is no suitable non- animal alternative. “Animal research and testing has played a part in

Case Study: The Benefits of Animal Testing

1757 words - 7 pages animal (Animal Welfare Act 1232). This training includes instruction on “the humane practice of animal maintenance and experimentation; research or testing methods that minimize or eliminate the use of animals or limit animal pain or distress” (Animal Welfare Act 1232). Contrary to popular belief, it is very obvious that researchers and scientist go to great lengths to insure that all animals are treated properly and with as little pain as possible

Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessary

1675 words - 7 pages , then putting an animal through any pain is immoral. However, there are laws in place to minimize discomfort and inhumane treatment. The laws limit the amount of distress and pain an animal is subjected to. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the body that governs animal testing, must approve all tests (United States Department of Agriculture). The USDA must also authorize the numbers and types of animals experimented on (United

What the Government Should do About Animal Testing

2125 words - 9 pages on vertebrate animals but exclude farm animals. Also, special permissions are needed for more severe testing and on certain animals. The three R’s are refinement, reduction and replacement and they strive to end needless suffering and experimentation. When establishing a policy it is important to understand the three R’s also. Refinement means that the experiment needs to be designed to limit the suffering of the animal. Reduction means that

We Need Animal Testing

2618 words - 11 pages . The Animal welfare act protects warm-blooded animals excluding birds, rats, and mice. Laboratories have to comply with the law while testing animals. This law put a limit on which animals could be tested and improved the living conditions for the animals that are used for testing (Animal Welfare Act). Scientists follow the laws to protect the animals from suffering during the experiments (Watson 39). Most scientists care about the animals they

We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics

1496 words - 6 pages dollars per product to test something using animals, as opposed to alternatives, which cost on average 50 dollars per product. One of the alternatives that is explained by writer is information. It is a way of computer cataloging all of the information that is already proven or not proven safe. Making this information available to everyone in the testing world helps to limit animal testing. If information is looked up and can be

an animal's survival

706 words - 3 pages for testing is the Animal Welfare Act, which only regulates cage size, cleanliness, food, and water, but does not limit the procedures that can be done. In addition, this law excludes rats, mice, birds, cold-blooded animals, and animals commonly killed for food—so rats and mice, the animals most commonly used in toxicity tests, are not even given minimal protections. Secondly, animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. The

The Ethics of Animal Testing for Vaccine Development and Potential Alternatives

2451 words - 10 pages regarding animal use.1,7,8 Animal testing is needed so that we may continue to conduct research and make progress in science and medicine. The 3Rs campaign does not suggest that animal testing be completely eliminated; rather, it promotes the search for other methods of testing. Exploring potential alternatives to animal testing allows us to determine when animal use is necessary and when it is not. By making an effort to limit the use of

Animal testing

1999 words - 8 pages are laws in place to minimize discomfort and inhumane treatment. The laws limit the amount of distress and pain an animal is subjected to. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the body that governs animal testing, must approve all testing performed (USDA). The USDA must also authorize the numbers and types of animals experimented on (USDA). Tests can no longer be performed if conclusive data is already available. In 1991, it was

Similar Essays

Limitation On Animal Testing Essay

952 words - 4 pages human body. These alternatives are all non-animal research models that can limit the number of animals used in testing. If these alternatives don’t help scientist with their research then animal testing should be consider, this would reduce the millions of innocent animals killed and torture each year. In conclusion, animal testing cannot be completely avoided but it can be limited. When good alternatives are available that can replace animals in

The Controversy Over Animal Testing Essay

2148 words - 9 pages -free testing of allergy products. “Science Letter. 24 January 2006: 36 eLibrary. Web 30 April 2010. Kanter, James. “E.U. animal-welfare plan may limit trade; A new law could protect test animals but could block more meat imports.” International Herald Tribune. 27. April 2010: 1. eLibrary. Web. 05 May 2010. “Companies That do Test on Animals //A-Z” Caring Consumer// search for cruelty free companies and products. Web. 05 May 2010.

Ways To Improve Animal Welfare After Premising The Animal Testing

1366 words - 5 pages experiment in each nation. Needless to say, it is too cruel to have one animal undergo experiments more than once. However, researchers use animals again and again as they are alive, and the maximum number of testing one go through is 50 times. As a result, animals have to experience extreme pain until they die. Therefore, researchers should limit the number of testing one animal experience to just one time. Merely practicing this limiting means

An Inside Look At Animal Experimentation

1733 words - 7 pages disposable equipment rather than living and breathing creatures. There is no limit to the experimentation on one animal’s body. Visualize being a hospitalized patient or a prisoner for life, this comparison is only a partial imagination of what an innocent animal in experimentation laboratories experience daily. The pain and torture an institutionalized animal endures is beyond what any person can visualize. While testing a substance during