Putting A Stope To Animal Testing

1027 words - 5 pages

Have you ever really thought about what happens during animal testing? How the animals are treated, or what tortures they have to face on a day to day basis? More than one-hundred million animals suffer and die every year through animal testing. Ninety-five percent of animals used aren’t even covered under the Animal Welfare Act, which regulates the treatment of the animals that are used for testing. Animal testing is a cruel, inhumane procedure and should be made illegal.
However, animal testing is very important to understanding the human body. Over the years, we have vivisection to thank for many of our medical advances we have reached this far. Vivisection is the practice of performing the testing procedures that are done on the live test animals. Some say that it is necessary to continue proceeding with animal testing so that we may keep making progress in the medical field. However, this is wrong because we have already gathered enough information to create alternatives for animal testing, yet we still continue to torment helpless animals. We should begin only using other choices to animal testing, since we have them. They are cheaper, accurate, and more precise. Why continue to waste millions of innocent animal’s lives per year when we have other options?
Besides, “animals aren’t as important as humans.” In our society, animals have little, if any rights because humans are the dominant species. It would be more moral to keep human suffering down to a minimum as opposed to animals suffering. But that’s not fair, because animals also have rights. But the Animal welfare Act (AWA) excludes mice and rats from these rights, and they make up approximately ninety-five percent of all animals used for experiments. Just because an animal can’t say no, doesn’t mean we have their consent to perform any of our savage tests. A mouse cannot speak for itself, but no living creature would willingly go through some of the horrendous procedures done on test animals.
Besides, humans and animals are not alike! Where’s the reason in testing products that are designed for humans, on animals? It makes no sense. Animals are going to react different, and then what was the point in testing in the first place, if the results are misleading? Companies can still sell a product, even if it tests badly on an animal. For more accurate results, some companies grow human skin cells in a lab and test on that. That method is cheaper, and more exact. It’s obvious that testing on a creature other than humans is wrong, but the more similar to a human it is, doesn’t that just make it worse? Like chimpanzees. We are ninety-six percent similar to chimps because they are a beautiful, smart species, so that just makes it wrong to be treating them as worthless objects. Is it really necessary to infect chimps with the AIDS virus? Would you want that?
Plus, there are even scientists that agree animal testing is a very outdated form of experimenting. In today’s society...

Find Another Essay On Putting a Stope to Animal Testing

A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

1186 words - 5 pages should not be a part of the pain and horrific conditions that humans put them through. We shouldn’t just let these innocent animals suffer and die to save human lives, when we could find other ways to treat diseases. Of course animal testing has contributed towards many life-saving cures and treatments. The California Biomedical Research Association states “nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from

Put An End To Animal Testing

707 words - 3 pages Imagine an animal in a cage waiting to be tested on. How does the animal feel? Stressed? Scared? Afraid? Fearful? Yes to all the above. There are several reasons why animal testing should be banned. There are multiple alternatives to animal testing. What applies to animals may not apply to humans. Lastly, stressed animal’s changes the data from experiments in unpredictable ways. Yes, I believe that animal testing for scientific research is cruel

Animal Testing Needs to be Stopped

831 words - 4 pages , there are people around you observing your pain. Life is miserable in your little empty cage. This is what life was for monkeys at the Institute of Behavioral Research in Silver Spring, Maryland. The monkeys at the institute had their nervous system incapacitated. The researchers would force the monkeys to move their limbs by withholding food from them (DeMello, Margo). This is a callous treatment of animals. Animal testing needs to be modulate

Animal Testing is Vital to Medical Advances

3050 words - 12 pages Research is responsible for virtually all the medical breakthroughs there have been- there are medicines and vaccines and cures and treatments and more life saving benefits being developed today- but an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Virtually almost everyone alive has benefited from the medical advances made feasible through animal testing. According to my aunt Blanca, who is a

Taking a Stand Against Animal Testing

1865 words - 7 pages that are performed on animals cannot be reliable, they are putting the animal in a different state. Furthermore, animals in laboratories display these behaviors which indicates extreme psychological distress. The kicker to all this is “experimenters acknowledge that the use of these stressed out animals jeopardizes the validity of the data produced” (PETA, 2014, Animal Testing is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint). Therefore, testing on animals

Animal Testing: A True Ethical Dilemma

1704 words - 7 pages Imagine a life locked away in a cage with no form of control on your existence. It’s cold, dark, and you are scared. You don’t have a choice of what you eat, where you live, or how you are treated. You are unsure if it is day or night or what will happen to you next. You are locked away in a prison cell and you committed no crime. This is the life of a laboratory animal. Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific research purposes and

Ways to Improve Animal Welfare After Premising the Animal Testing

1366 words - 5 pages experiment in each nation. Needless to say, it is too cruel to have one animal undergo experiments more than once. However, researchers use animals again and again as they are alive, and the maximum number of testing one go through is 50 times. As a result, animals have to experience extreme pain until they die. Therefore, researchers should limit the number of testing one animal experience to just one time. Merely practicing this limiting means

It's Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1442 words - 6 pages us to take a look at our lives and gain an understanding of how much pain and suffering goes into the items we take for granted every day. Before you put on mascara or shampoo your hair, think about what animal suffered needlessly so you can have longer, fuller looking lashes. Then consider the alternatives in non animal testing products. Lists of companies that use animals for testing are published on the web. I challenge you to ask questions

Animal Testing and In Vitro Testing as a Replacement

1032 words - 5 pages , many of these tests are inconclusive and require further examination. In 1959, to combat some of the controversial animal testing practices, William Russell and Rex Burch proposed a set of three principles aimed at revising safety testing. The principles known as “The Three Rs”, comprised of replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement regards replacing live animals with non-living ones, and in vitro and in silico assays. However

Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

1341 words - 5 pages There is a fine line between working toward a cause effectively and overdoing it. Animal rights activists cross this line time and time again with their outrageous protests attempting to abolish the use of animals in scientific experiments. They don't understand that it is crucial for scientists to carry out these experiments in order for our society to continue improving health wise.We live longer and healthier lives due to the testing of

Animal Testing: Are we right to give them no rights? (supports animal testing)

710 words - 3 pages There is a fine line between working toward a cause effectively and overdoing it. Animal rights activists cross this line time and time again with their outrageous protests attempting to abolish the use of animals in scientific experiments. They don't understand that it is crucial for scientists to carry out these experiments in order for our society to continue improving health wise.We live longer and healthier lives due to the testing of

Similar Essays

A More Responsible Approach To Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1628 words - 7 pages It’s Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation The debate about using animals for medical testing has been raging for years. The struggle always seems to be between extremist animal rights activists who believe that animals should never be used for research, and scientists who believe that any use of animals is acceptable. There are a growing number who argue that there must be a reasonable

Animal Testing Needs To Stop Essay

1039 words - 4 pages the law, yet still they get away with it. Who wants these companies taking charge of our rights- our freedom? Therefore, animals should not be used as lab specimens just so we humans can indulge ourselves in beauty products. Take a stand against animal testing, immediately, and stop this brutal treatment that is being done to these defenseless animals. Above all, help save their lives, and help show others how important it is that people know

A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

1322 words - 6 pages since they don’t have the same anatomic, metabolic, an cellular systems. The last thing wrong with animal testing is that there are alternatives that could work better than testing on animals. Recently there has been more and more protest against animal testing. One example of an outcry that the public had would be with the Draize rabbit eye test. Scientists were putting a substance in the eye of multiple rabbits (usually around three to six

A Case Against Animal Testing Essay

2016 words - 9 pages animals. According to Rachel Hajar, M.D., Director of Non-Invasive Cardiology Section at Hamad Medical Corporation, the first known case of animal testing was where performed experiments on living animals by Greek physician-scientists Aristotle a (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 – 258 BC). However, animal to become relevant in till an Arab physician Ibn Zuhr use animal testing to practice surgical procedures before using it on