Just a few years ago there was a significant catastrophic nuclear failure. This failure caused huge amounts of radioactive materials to be released into the environment. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster quickly became the largest nuclear incident since the 1986 Chernobyl accident while both have affected the environment immensely with radiation. Due to the potential safety issues, the risk to the environment, and the dangers of nuclear power, the use of nuclear facilities must be called off to prevent meltdowns and irreparable damage to the surrounding area.
One reason why nuclear power must be eliminated is due to the fact that it does not justify the danger it creates. According to Malik Imran’s blog entitled “Nuclear Power Not Sufficient Enough?” as published on the 4urtech.blogspot, “ . . .[N]uclear energy with current efficiency levels isn’t enough . . .there needs to be much more research efforts, mainly to improve efficiency in order to make [a] nuclear energy solution capable to replace fossil fuels.” Since nuclear energy will never be a good substitute for fossil fuels, it is clear that its production needs to be abandoned completely.
Others agree that efficiency is an issue. “[H]e considers much more efforts should be mainly done to improve nuclear power efficiency . . .and switch to fuel enrichment based on gas centrifuge technology, which is more energy-efficient than current gaseous diffusion methods” (Imran). Clearly there is something more efficient to be used than trying to make nuclear energy work.
According to Tiffa Nur Latifa, author of “Nuclear Power Generation: Efficient or Not? Based on Pareto Efficiency” as published on Tales of The Breeze website:
Compared to other energy source[s] . . .the approximate cost[s] [are] nearly the same as coal generated or wind generated electricity . . . .[N]uclear power can generate electricity in [a] larger amount . . . .Despite [that advantage,] nuclear power generation has some disadvantages in [the] post producing process. Radioactive waste can not be recycled and has to be kept under strict repository until its half-life ends its radioactivity.
Even though nuclear energy makes more electricity, the cost of storing dangerous radioactive waste for the number of years it takes for it to reach its half-life is preposterous.
In short it is clear that nuclear energy produces more energy, but more does not mean that it is an efficient energy production process or delivery system.
Another reason why nuclear power needs to be eliminated is because it is too dangerous considering the threat of short term potential for meltdowns. According to “Chernobyl Accident 1986” as published on the World Nuclear Association website, “The April 1986 disaster at the Chernobyl power plant in Ukraine was the product of a flawed Soviet reactor design coupled with serious mistakes made by the plant operators [and] was a direct consequence of Cold War isolation and the resulting lack of any safety. . ....