Prevention Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction Proliferation And Terrorism

2283 words - 9 pages

The whole world is just waiting for the one country, whether it is China, Russia, or North Korea, to set off a nuclear missile that would start a nuclear war and that would only end when there are few survivors left. However, maybe there is another way that a war could have an extreme number of casualties on every continent. The United States Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism believes that an attack with a biological weapon is more likely than one with a nuclear weapon (Suk). This seems strange considering our culture is focused on the big boom that would wipe out the majority of the population. But this would be a silent but deadly terrorist attack using one of the world’s most lethal diseases to cause a worldwide pandemic that would kill millions of people.
There are millions of viruses and bacteria that are known but only few, if put in the wrong hands, could cause a bioterrorism attack. However, the Northern Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has identified 31 biological agents that could be used in a terrorist attack (Evans). The US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease (USAMRIID) has further reduced this list to six: B. anthracis, variola virus, Y. pestis, Francisella tularensis, botulinum toxin, and the hemorrhagic fever viruses (Evans). Each of these agent’s severity depends on how quickly they can spread and how many people will die from them in an amount of time.
B. anthracis (anthrax) is able to live in conditions where air is not available and it can form into heat resistant spores, which makes it ideal for biological warfare (Ahn). This disease has already been proven before to be an effective bioterrorism agent. In October of 2001, one week after the 9/11 attacks, letters with anthrax spores were mailed to members of the media and U.S. senators (Tan). The reason it was caught so fast could be because it was affecting people in the United States with power and those that had to constantly be aware of terrorist attacks. However, if these anthrax spores had released into the general public, more casualties would have probably occurred. Bioterrorists can learn from other people’s mistakes and next time, the country might not be so lucky.
Smallpox (variola virus) is more of a concern because not only can it spread from person to person through the air, but also by contact of contaminated fabrics. Following exposure, one can infect others within seven to twelve days, which could cause a full-scale epidemic before public health authorities could respond (Evans).
The plague (Y. pestis) has happened three times in history with the pneumonic plague being the most dangerous. Within those three plagues, over 200 million people have died (Evans). There is no evidence to say that the plague could not happen again, but this time it would be because someone intentionally exposed it to the public. H.H. Mollaret declared that: ‘The plague has a past; it has a present;...

Find Another Essay On Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism

Weapons of Mass Destruction Are Bad

2261 words - 9 pages dangerous to human life. They also cause damage to human made structures as well. Weapons of mass destruction can be classified as nuclear, biological or chemical. When we speak of nuclear weapons, we refer to the most deadly and dangerous weapons ever created (Krieger).The power that they possess can destroy cities, kill millions of people, harm the environment and can affect the lives of the future generations to come (Krieger). In nuclear weapons,the

Technological Developments on Weapons of Mass Destruction

1003 words - 4 pages weapons." updated May 18, 2004The U.S. president used this description while communicating with Congress.The Weapons of Mass Destruction Control Act of 1992,"to the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and their related technology ."The first WMD bomb this century was dropped on Hiroshima nicknamed "little boy" referring to Roosevelt at 08:15am on 6th August 1945.Exploding at about 580m above

Weapons of Mass Destruction: Problems or Solutions?

1610 words - 7 pages ? We must all learn the dangers of weapons of mass destruction to decide which side to stand up for. Government and Military strength has always decided which countries are the best in the world. Now with drones, the development of lasers, and nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, every modern organization is a credible threat. Our way of life is balancing on a gymnast's beam. A big enough push could topple us over the edge. Nuclear power is

This is about weapons of mass destruction including anthrax etc

1496 words - 6 pages Weapons of Mass DestructionChemical and Biological Warfare, use of harmful or deadly chemical or biological agents as weapons of war. These agents can kill many people and are considered weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons are made up of poisonous chemical compounds, whereas biological weapons are living microorganisms. Toxin weapons contain poisonous chemical products of living organisms and are sometimes classified separately

Disarment, Weapons of Mass Destruction and Outer Space: Mongolia´s Stand

1504 words - 7 pages The topics before the First Committee are: Relationship between Disarmament and Development, Measures to prevent Terrorists from acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction, Prevention of arms Race in Outer Space. Mongolia is dedicated to collaborative

The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

1524 words - 6 pages continues to the present day. The official nuclear countries, Russia, France, United States, United Kingdom and China have shown no plans of giving up their nuclear weapons, fueling proliferation by non-nuclear states. Although numerous non-nuclear countries have sought nuclear weapons, few are known to have succeeded. Those with nuclear weapons programs include India, Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan. There are fears that other countries such

The Huxley Vision: Weapons of Mass Distraction

961 words - 4 pages Humanity has always been fascinated by books which provide us with an apocalyptic view of the future. The destruction of a nation; the fall of our government—or in Huxley’s vision, its rise to power in formidable ways. As Huxley puts it, “the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance…[and humanity] would be reduced to passivity and egoism.” In contemporary America, Huxley’s pessimistic, yet already-fulfilled prophecy illustrates how both

Gruinard Island: Weapon of Mass Destruction

1260 words - 5 pages Gruinard Island is just one metaphoric piece of debris left over from the fallout and effects of Germany during World War 2 (WW2). This is just another testimony to the underappreciated fear of the invisible killer, the quiet storm and the science of the dragon’s breath also know as Weapons of Mass Destruction. This example is played out on the island of Gruinard merely a proving ground in fear of Germany’s biological program. Gruinard Island

Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile

3811 words - 15 pages Mass Destruction of Ecosystems to Accommodate the Automobile Mitigation, to the dismay of some, has become publicly synonymous with notions of preservation and conservation. Mitigation is neither the ‘preservation’ nor is it the ‘conservation’ of habitat. Mitigation is the creation of new habitat, or the guarding of an existing habitat to "make up" for the destruction of similar habitat somewhere else. It was the infamous environmental buzz

the threat of nuclear proliferation

1253 words - 5 pages weapons, the designs and components thereof, and to coordinate “nuclear energy development” and the “safeguards system to ensure that nuclear materials are not diverted ‘to purposes other than for those which they are intended,’” (Baylis-Smith, p. 430). Various treaties and agreements, both formal and unspoken have also come into existence in order to regulate nuclear proliferation and prevent it from reaching the bounds of terrorism. The Treaty

The History and Obstacles of Facing International Human Rights Proliferation

1860 words - 7 pages achieving a set of universal human rights that all can agree to has been a tumultuous process for over a century. Disagreements standing in the way of successful international human rights proliferation include clashing cultural and religious views, disagreement on who is entitled to rights, and the argument that Western values are being imposed on the rest of the globe. The beginnings of the crusade for human rights across the globe can be

Similar Essays

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay

795 words - 4 pages extremely fast and cause the brink of global warfare once again, or even end all wars by exterminating a vast majority of the human race. Nuclear weapons can cause gigantic casualties on a scale never seen before, and the potential to dramatically affect the course of the human race which is a huge threat unique to the past sixty-six years. While a vast majority of the world is against weapons of mass destruction, a small minority support them. One

Weapons Of Mass Destruction And Risk Galore

1338 words - 6 pages that can be traced in Syria today, have the potential to spread quickly while causing death and severe injury to those affected. Like chemical weapons, biological weapons which have been used since the early 1900’s, possess the trait of quick contamination and severe damage to those affected. In history, weapons of mass destruction like atom bombs, chemical gas and biological weapons have caused major catastrophes around the world, and their

Chemical And Biological Weapons Of Mass Destruction

1536 words - 7 pages law does not address these issues well enough. International law should be advanced to restrict BWs research programs done in the name of science. CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY Even after the first nuclear weapon was used by the United States in 1945 and the world watched its mass damage on both human being and environment, there have been serious arms race of nuclear weapons and various nuclear experiments by many

Chemical Weapons: Weapons Of Mass Destruction

652 words - 3 pages Chemical weapons, devices used for the sole purpose of hurting or killing humans, are widely considered one of the four types of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Chemical weapons are devices that spread a certain toxic chemical to incapacitate people. The two most dangerous kinds of chemical weapons are nerve agents and vesicant, or blister, agents. Types There five kinds of chemical agents. Lethal, Incapacitating agents, Riot control gases