Science Vs. Religion Essay

2052 words - 8 pages

Science vs. Religion

Since the dawn of man, humans have striven to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to justify our existence in it. Throughout this journey of self-understanding, numerous standpoints on human existence have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called religion. However, as the human race has grown and advanced itself, many ideas expressed by religion seem less and less plausible. Advances in science and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious ideology. Our new, scientifically grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age-old questions, which are antithetical to the explanations offered by religion. As strong scientific evidence has surfaced which is contrary to the prevailing religious view, open-minded believers have adapted their beliefs accordingly, but many fundamentalists refuse to accept scientific evidence. This is the root of the dilemma between science and religion. Many philosophers and theists have offered their views concerning the ongoing battle between science and religion.
Reconciliation between science and religion is impossible, because the claims made by religion and the evidence provided by science are so extraordinarily different. The advance of science has caused many theists to compromise traditional religious beliefs in order to facilitate scientific evidence, thus proving that scientific explanations of the universe are more plausible than the rationales offered by religion. An excellent example of this can be seen in the question of the age of the planet Earth. According to religious theology, the Earth is less than ten thousand years old. However, there is an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that proves the Earth to be many billions of years old. Many religious thinkers have responded to this evidence, by claiming that the methods used to ascertain the Earth's age are inaccurate. They argue that radioactive dating; a widely accepted method of determining the age of rocks, is inaccurate because there is no available rock sample of a known age, which the method can be calibrated to. However, this argument is obsolete, because the only calibration required to find the age of a rock is the measurement of decay rates, which can be found in the laboratory in a controlled experiment (Badash 90).
Because of the evidence provided by scientific research, many religious thinkers have been forced to compromise their position, and have attempted to blend scientific fact with biblical accounts of the age of the earth. Many theists contend that the words of the bible are metaphorical, and can be interpreted in a way that reconciles the biblical account of the Earth's age with scientific fact. According to Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, the earth was created in six days: "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very...

Find Another Essay On Science vs. Religion

Inherit the Wind: Religion vs. Science

1214 words - 5 pages Inherit the Wind: Religion vs. Science   Stanley Kramer's film, Inherit the Wind, examines a trial based on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee. Often referred to as "The Trial of the Century" (Scopes Trial Web Page), the Scopes trial illuminated the controversy between the Christian theory of creation and the more scientific theory of evolution. John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was arrested for illegally

Knowledge: Science vs Religion Essay

1607 words - 6 pages There has already been some knowledge that people once believed in, but then someone discovered new information that contradicted the previous knowledge everyone thought was true. In this essay I will consider some knowledge issues considering the view of two different areas of knowledge, which I chose natural science and religion. The purpose of this essay is to distinguish between different accepted knowledge, and to investigate why some

Science vs Religion

1567 words - 6 pages Title of Assignment Is science just another form of religion, with people like physicist Stephen Hawking among its high priests? Are science and religions simply both similar social constructions? In your response to this question, specifically consider how irrational social factors influence everything, including science and religion. Introduction One of today's most disputable and warmed issues is whether the clash between science and

Science VS Religion

2196 words - 9 pages Science and Religion (By darongma@yahoo.com)Science and Religion have been long time enemies to each other as they may seem to the world. For centuries, they have remained noble but arrogant, both stood firm on their own grounds, neither wanted to give way. For many scientists, they are afraid that tortures the church once imposed on Galileo for speaking of scientific truth would again repeat; they fear that not only religion slows down

Science vs. Religion: How were we created?

1502 words - 6 pages      The idea of creation is one of the most controversial issues we have today. Your age, background, religion, and beliefs are the main characters that effect what you believe created the world. Science believes several theories on the creation but the most accepted is the Big Bang Theory. Religion has their own views on creation, Christians believe that God created the world, Islamic believe that Allah created man but

Religion and Faith vs. Reason and Science

1039 words - 4 pages The general assumption with people is that science and religion, or faith and reason, are stuck in an infinite war against each other. Someone must choose to be a person of thought, reason, and science, or choose to embrace religion, scripture, and faith alone. If this is true, then someone who is with the Roman Catholic Church rejects science with all of its theories, and if one embraces science, then one rejects the Church and all of her

`Why did Charlemagne accept the imperial title?' Science vs Religion

2483 words - 10 pages effect of science on religion during the course of the nineteenth century, have tended to employ two terms: `religious science' and `irreligious science' .To some, this distinction may appear unnecessary, since science as a process of discovery is not generally taken to overlap with theology. However, when a schism began to appear in society between those willing to defend their inherited faith, and those unwilling to do so (and in many cases

Science and Religion

1272 words - 5 pages vs. evolution is one of the only foundations between the relationship of religion and science. Contrarily, science and religion are not at a constant battle. They exist as two different, usually conflicting, beliefs of solving the same problem (A Brief Overview; Examples; Causes). Pumfrey explains this:"Although histories of science and religion produced in recent decadeshave tended to argue that complexification and contextualization

Argument Between Science and Religion

1961 words - 8 pages Why would educated, reasonable people believe in one side of an argument when the majority of the evidence points to the other? The argument between science and religion began with Charles Darwin publishing Origin of the Species, and since then, is still a conflict, because every individual questions: Where do people come from? Where does the earth come from? The universe? Not only Charles Darwin, but many scientist who followed Charles Darwin

Science and Religion. . . Sisters or Enemies?

1573 words - 6 pages . Zero: The Bibliography of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Viking Penguin, 2002.von Braun, Wernher. "Science as Religious Activity." All Believers are Brothers."Why We Are Not Muslims." The Science of Islam vs The Religion of Islam. IBIBLIO.ORG. http://www.ibiblio.org/nge/notmuslims.html. 13 May, 2003.

Science V. Religion: The Scopes Monkey Trial

1389 words - 6 pages overturns the conviction on a technicality. The judge, not the jury, set the fine. The law is not declared unconstitutional and it stayed on the law books until 1967. In closing, the Scopes trial represented the turbulence of the 1920s, but remains relevant today. It was a fierce battle of modern vs. traditional. It was the new science vs. the old religion. It was a battle that did not have a clear victory for either side, but did open the eyes of

Similar Essays

Science Vs. Religion Essay

1417 words - 6 pages Religion versus science, the debates and conflicts have been on for centuries. For both religious and scientific ideals, the faith people have drives them. In this paper, I will examine the story of “The Eye of Apollo” by G.K. Chesterton, and the episode “House vs. God” of House, M.D., in order to question this conflict. The main character—Father Brown—in “The Eye of Apollo” combines his reasoning with his religious ideals and beliefs, or we can

Religion Vs. Science Essay

1689 words - 7 pages Religion vs. Science This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I also have faith. Scientific research has lead to dramatic and more humane treatments of persons suffering from mental disease, depression, and physical injury. The reputation of scientists has reached an all-time high. Majority of Americans have said

Religion Vs. Science Essay

1007 words - 4 pages Religion vs. Science The human mind is easily convinced on what the eyes tell the mind. If you see something in front of yourself, you might have an easier time believing, than if one was to tell a story. Religion is a story that has been told for thousands of years, and not till technology has ripened have scientists disproved many beliefs. It is now that mankind lets religion restrain the mind from portraying the truth about life

Science Vs. Religion Essay

2301 words - 10 pages One of the great public battlegrounds in modern time is science vs. religion. Is this the great unwinnable war, or is there a common ground? I suggest that the issue is not either side is absolutely right or wrong; the issue in our public discourse, in our public theology, is the misinformation both sides present and the failure to understand the complexity of information. As Donald Rumsfeld might say, it is "the unknown known" - a failure to