Smokers Have Rights Also Essay

1949 words - 8 pages

The Smokers Have Rights Also
It is common knowledge now that smoking is bad, so we should not do it, right? Not necessarily, there are many things that are bad for us, but we still do them anyway such as eating fast food. Everyone knows anything that has been deep fried is horrible for your health, but we still do it because we like it, and the same goes for smoking. Like other things, smoking can be acceptable in moderation. But some may question this because smoking not only hurts the one smoking, but others around them. There are ways for nonsmokers to avoid smokers and there are ways for smokers to avoid nonsmokers. People just need to try and change things rather than sit around and complain about it. Why should something such as smoking, which is a personal choice, be banned just because someone else does not like it? Smoking should not be banned because smoking is a personal choice and everyone has the right to decide on one’s own health.
One may argue the main reason to ban cigarettes is not because it hurts the smoker, rather ban cigarettes due to secondhand smoke. Whenever one thinks of secondhand smoke, they think about the big cloud of smoke coming out of a smokers lungs, but this is not what they should be worried about. The smoke that has come out of the lungs has gone through the filter of the cigarette and been filtered through the lungs, the smoke coming from the lit end of the cigarette is what one should be worried about. This smoke is directly releasing the chemicals in the cigarette therefore not being filtered first which does make somewhat of a difference.
Secondhand smoke is a combination of smoke coming from the lit end of the cigarette and what the smoker exhales (Johnson). It is estimated that there are 46,000 heart disease deaths and 3,400 lung cancer deaths cause by secondhand smoke each year (Johnson). There is also research that suggests breathing in secondhand smoke increases one’s risk for breast and nasal sinus cancer (Johnson). “A 2006 U.S. surgeon general's report noted that nonsmokers who live with smokers have a 20 percent to 30 percent greater chance of developing lung cancer” (Johnson). According to the National Cancer Institute, about 250 chemicals in secondhand smoke, of the 7,000, are known to be harmful and seventy of them can cause cancer (Johnson). “The study of 11 moderately dependent cigarette smokers and 13 nonsmokers found 1 hour of secondhand smoke in an enclosed space resulted in nicotine reaching the brain, in smokers and nonsmokers alike, to bind nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that are normally targeted by direct exposure to tobacco smoke. Secondhand smoke also evoked cravings among the smokers, suggesting that it may deliver a priming dose of nicotine to the brain that contributes to continued cigarette use in smokers” (Hampton). These are just some of the effects of secondhand smoke, the list goes on. It is made clear simply from the list I have compiled that secondhand smoke it...

Find Another Essay On Smokers Have Rights Also

Banning Smoking in Public Places Essay

626 words - 3 pages cigarettes, a ban against smoking in public places should be put into motion to protect non-smokers, to improve the health of smokers, and to reduce the overall use of tobacco products among smokers while protecting their rights. Nearly everywhere people go; there is always someone smoking as if there is no way to avoid them. When it comes to the health-risk second-hand smoke is as dangerous as smoking a cigarette. In today’s society, it is rare

America: Land of the Free - Home of the Misanthropes A Response to Florence King Summary/Strong Response Essay

1426 words - 6 pages . I, like King, want smokers to maintain their right to smoke and even regain some of the public access rights they have lost. Unlike King, I would also like the right to be free from smoke. While she takes meticulous care to note the offenses against smokers in her essay, King fails to address the issue of the rights non-smokers deserve to enjoy a smoke free environment and how the rights of both parties may be able to coexist. Those whom

Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?

885 words - 4 pages says, "It's a true clash of individual rights. The 30% of people who smoke have rights like anyone else, but if tobacco smoke is an irritant to people that share the space, there's a real problem. There should be a compromise where people can smoke in ventilated areas hopefully without bothering non-smokers" (Philip 13). Not only is second hand smoke unappealing, but it is also very dangerous to everyone's health. Studies show that in 1986 in the

Smoking Cigarettes

743 words - 3 pages ) (Smokers Behavior) spending too much money buying cigarettes. Unlike smokers, non-smokers do not stress out about situations such as not getting a smoke break at work, how many cigarettes they have left, or why cigarette prices have sky-rocketed. Non-smokers also do not have to deal with the burden of quitting. In the same way, both smokers and non-smokers have to deal with health problems due to cigarette smoke. Second hand smoke

Smoke Free Society

1132 words - 5 pages properly, how do you expect him or her to become a good swimmer? In America, the habit of smoking has spread throughout the society. Whose rights are really being violated? When smokers light up among us nonsmokers (including infants and children), we have no choice but to breathe in their toxic residue. Simply having smoking sections in restaurants does not solve the problem. This is the same as requesting to swim in the non

For the Sake of Others

1336 words - 6 pages eliminate these issues(statistics). On the other side if this issue smokers believe that to have public bans against smoking is infringing on their rights as citizens and that there are more harmful things that need to be banned. These things include human trafficking and alcohol, they could both be banned and it would benefit society. These people also believe that it is an inconvenience for them to have to go outside to smoke a little cigarette

Please Take Your Butt Outside

851 words - 3 pages hand smoke causes irritation to the eyes, nose, and throat, headache and dizziness, and can seriously aggravate asthma. Second hand smoke makes non-smokers feel lousy. For example, when I come home at night from a club or a bar I not only smell like a walking ashtray but I also have a very difficult time breathing because of all the smoke that I breathed into my lungs. Second hand smoke is very dangerous and I don’t believe that non-smokers

The Twain Should Meet

2931 words - 12 pages large amounts of money from the tobacco companies for the burdens placed on themselves and their loved ones by the ills of tobacco. One famous suit was the Florida suit:" A Miami jury orders Americas' big tobacco companies to pay, $145 billion in punitive damages after finding them liable for the lung cancer and some 20 other ailments among an estimated 500,000 unidentified smokers in Florida."3. The "rights," of the non-smoker have gained a lot of

Cigarette Smoking Should Not Be Banned

1974 words - 8 pages addictive and contains harmful substances that cause cancer and other damages to the body. I feel as if smokers know the risks that outweigh the benefits that they have the right to do so and, as an American citizen you have the rights and to take that right away cuts jobs. It is again against the American rights to interfere with smokers’ rights. Living in the United States is considered living in the land of the free, but when it comes to

Public Smoking Ban

1358 words - 5 pages may also help smokers to quit smoking gradually. The smoking ban in public places will allow smokers to limit the amount of cigarette they smoke and turn down their bad habit when they are out in public places. Even though, smoking banning in public places have positive effects on both smokers and nonsmokers, some smokers may disagree. There is a vast population of smokers who are chronic smokers, and having to stop their smoking habit in

No Smoking

1399 words - 6 pages stripped of their rights, becoming second-class citizens as smoking laws become stricter. They may also say that they are being isolated from others with the division between the smoking section and non-smoking section. They might feel that because they smoke, they have to be excommunicated because there are certain places you cannot sit when you smoke. Also, they might say that a non-smoker could sit in the smoking section, but a smoker can't

Similar Essays

This Essay Is About African Women Where I Explain Women Have Rights And Freedom In Their Society. I Also Have Work Cited Too

601 words - 2 pages Women everywhere have had to push the grain in society. Everyday women fightfor their human rights. We live in an age where women have gained access, and freedomsto explore a wide range of interest, and life styles more than they ever could in the past. We have a long ways to go. In the past, women have been oppressed to a point where they were treated as a completely different species. They were in a country that seemed to be a dark tunnel with

Smoking In Public Buildings Essay

688 words - 3 pages health, vehicles that discharge exhaust fumes, such as buses or trucks, must be eliminated first because those injure people's health more. If smokers and nonsmokers are careful, there is not any harm from second hand smoke.In conclusion, because smokers' have the right and freedom to smoke, public buildings should allow smokers to smoke. Public buildings cannot be used by nonsmokers only. Smokers also have the rights to enjoy smoking in public

Smokers Rights' Vs Nonsmokers' Rights Essay

1664 words - 7 pages Smokers’ vs Nonsmokers’ Rights We have all heard the warnings of the negative effects on health and on the environment caused by tobacco smoke from nonsmokers and their anti-smoking campaigns. These campaigns give nonsmokers a way to voice their right to breathe clean air and to protect their health and the environment. We have seen how society, businesses, and government have taken action to promote a smoke free society and to accommodate

Designated Smoking Areas Essay

1296 words - 5 pages , smokers would not be able to exercise their rights to smoke anywhere at all in public limiting their opportunities to smoke anywhere but at a private residence. They would also argue that the ban would be very beneficial to people that do not smoke at all by limiting exposure to the harmful chemicals released by cigarette smoke. The ban would help limit exposure, however doing so in a manner that impedes the rights of others is not justifiably