Socrates And Descartes On Dual Essay

678 words - 3 pages


Socrates and Descartes on Dualism

Dualism means the complete separation of the mental world and the physical world. In philosophy, it is the theory that the universe is explicable only as a whole composed of two distinct and mutually exclusive factors: the mind and the body. Socrates and Plato are called dualists because they think that mind and body are separate and distinct substances. Mind is conscious and non-spatial and body is spatial but not conscious. While separate, these two substances interact. Both Socrates and Descartes argue that the mind and body are separable and immortal.
     
In the Phaedo, Socrates argues that the body is attached to the soul but that the soul can exist independently of it. In fact, as the body drags the soul around, it only confuses the soul with its senses and does not allow the soul to obtain truth and wisdom. The only way the soul can find pure knowledge or reality is to become separate from the body since "the soul reasons best when none of the senses troubles it… but when it is most by itself, taking leave of the body… in its search for reality" (Plato 102).

In the pursuit of knowledge, the only way to discover reality is to separate the body from the soul. This freedom from the body is called death. This does not mean that one should live in a state close to death, but one should not fear death.
     
Socrates explains that " our souls… existed apart from the body before they took on a human form" (Plato 115).
Since our souls were alive before we existed, then according to Socrates, our souls exist after death also. Souls exist in two ways after death. If a person is good and follows the practices of philosophy, then their soul will "make its way to the invisible, which like itself, the divine and immortal and wise" (Plato 120). Here it will exist free of human ills such as ignorance, confusion, and fear, and spend its time with the gods. However, if a person thinks they know what...

Find Another Essay On Socrates And Descartes On Dual

an essay with personal opinions on hume and descartes on the theory of ideas

613 words - 2 pages David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers with opposing views about the origination of ideas. Descartes believed there were three types of ideas which are, innate, adventitious and those from imagination. He stated since he exists and his idea of what a perfect being is, such as God, then God exists. Hume, on the other had, believed ideas came only from one thing, impressions. Both theories have their strengths and weaknesses but I like

The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy

1488 words - 6 pages The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy In order to embark on his quest for truth, Descartes first devises his four rules which should serve as a solid foundation for all else that he comes to understand. Those rules are here evaluated in terms of what they fail to take into consideration. The rules are examined individually and consecutively, and are therefore also reiterated in order to be

Socrates-not perfect- I got a A- at UC Berkeley on it Essay on how Socrates arguments are contradictory and can be proven faulty. This essay proves a few of Socrates arguments faulty

1249 words - 5 pages plan to show that Socrates argument is flawed as he leaves too many questions unanswered and his belief relies much too heavily on assumption. In addition, Socrates argument relies on a false premise, my argument reads as follows:Socrates suggests that if there are moral "experts", we should listen to them. This is a flawed statement since there is no such thing. Morality as a whole differs from opinion to opinion and person-to-person, what is

Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning

923 words - 4 pages Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order

Just some notes on Socrates and the Trial of the Generals

3406 words - 14 pages on that day, so was responsible for seeing that legal procedures were followed, and failed so to do. The people later regretted their actions and the men who pushed through these proposals were prosecuted and found guilty of perverting the constitution and were themselves executed. Six years later Sokrates was prosecuted and executed on a charge of impiety and corrupting the young. See Xen Hell 1.7.1-35This occurred during the year that Socrates

Rene Descartes' Examination of the Nature of Mateial Things and What is Possible to Know of them Based on Passages from Meditations on First Philosophy. (the Wax example)

605 words - 2 pages "How do we know what we know?" This is a question asked by Rene Descartes as well as a host of other philosophers. A particular passage written in Meditations on First Philosophy by Descartes dubbed the "Wax Passage" examined the nature of material things, and what we really know about them. Descartes' thought process shall be followed, and his conclusion that if all attributes are stripped away, what is left is the "essence" of the wax, will be

Title: Mind and Body: An interpretation on the works of Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza -Talks about "Dualism" and "Double Aspect Theory"

1152 words - 5 pages dubitable. The first are material attributes, or extensions, such as "these general things (eyes, head, hands, the whole body) (233)" which Descartes goes on to explain "are true and exist (233)." Second is the category in which things are immaterial or un-extended, for example, the mind as a "thinking and un-extended thing (235)." In Descartes' point of view there is a clear distinction between the material and the immaterial. It is possible to

Descartes' arguments for immateriality of mind/soul based on the notion of dualism: body is extended object and mind/soul is non-extended

1858 words - 7 pages . Therefore, if the wax piece was melted, the shape and size disappear. But the piece of wax is not an attribute of something else and does not depend on it, so the wax itself exists even without its properties. So Descartes demonstrates here, considering mind and body, that each thing can exist by itself and are distinct kind of things. But it does not imply that mind and body really do exist apart from each other. Therefore, it still not clear whether

Descartes and how he came to his conclusions on the existence of the world. This was originally used for a presentation

615 words - 2 pages god.Now we know that there really is a being powerful enough to deceive us. But Descartes argued that since all perfections naturally go together, and since deception is invariably the product of imperfection, it follows that the truly omnipotent being has no reason or motive for deception. God does not deceive, and doubt of the deepest sort may be abandoned forever. Therefore, we can go on to say that the world we percieve also exists.Though

A Close Analysis On Plato's Republic. Answers To Such Questions As: What Is Socrates' Reply To Thrasymachus's Notion That Injustice Makes One "Stronger And More Effective" Than Justice (34)?

628 words - 3 pages conclusion that Socrates and Thrasymachus have reached on justice. Glaucon decides to explain the origins of the meaning of justice. People who decided "neither to do wrong nor to suffer it" (44) enforced laws which they called "lawful and right" (44). Justice was established as a form of compromise not because it is good or righteous but because no man is worthy of being unjust (44). Glaucon continues by saying that men practice justice because they

Descartes & John Locke

2345 words - 9 pages The Move from Doubt to Certainty; A Look at the Theories of Descartes and Locke Descartes is interested in the certainty of his existence and the existence of other people and things. Descartes' beliefs vary from those of Socrates. Descartes argues that knowledge is acquired through awareness and experience. Using this approach, Descartes moves through doubt to certainty of his existence. He asks himself various questions about the certainty of

Similar Essays

Descartes On The Mind And Body

834 words - 4 pages we cannot claim that Descartes is correct in his theory of substances. Works Cited Descartes, Rene. Meditations of First Philosophy with Selections firm the Objections and Replies. 1986. Reprint. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Aquinas, Thomas. The Treatise on Human Nature. Indianapolis: Hacett Publishing Company, 2002.

Socrates On Athenian Law And Obedience

1559 words - 6 pages still willing to do what he deemed just even if it meant his death.Socrates states that the will of the Athenian people was final, and what ever punishment they decided on, he would accept (Apology 29b). However Socrates does say that he would not accept a punishment of him to stop philosophizing as it was against the gods will (Apology 29d). Socrates also says "be sure that this is what the god orders me to do, and I think there is no greater

Hume, Descartes, And Nietzsche's Views On Immortality

1290 words - 6 pages of a person’s existence, even after death. Immortality primarily referred to soul as it like it does not die when the human body dies, but since they both well connected together, when the body dies, soul dies too; therefore, immortality does not exist. Hume broadens the evidence of experience shows us that thought and consciousness depends on our bodily existence and; hence, physical death must indicate death of the mind as well. He shows this

Aristotle, Rousseau And Descartes On Technology

1646 words - 7 pages While it is relatively easy to confuse the ideas of Aristotle, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and René Descartes, ancient philosophy, eighteenth century politics, and mathematics all appear to be considerably disconnected subjects. Associated with these divisions are three different opinions on a common subject matter: technology. It appears that Rousseau directly opposes technology, Aristotle’s opinion rests in the middle but also shares similarities