Testing On Animals: Wrong Or Right

1483 words - 6 pages

Animal Experimentation and Animal Rights PAGE 6
Animal Experimentation and Animal RightsRichard Wellman Azusa Pacific Online UniversityThe animal rights discussion is a very very difficult one to have for most people, and the topic itself is a very intricate one that has many sub-topics that reside within the main topic itself. However, for the purpose of a clearer and more precise essay I have chosen to focus primarily on animal testing and experimentation. "Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research. Early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle, (384 - 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 - 258 BC), performed experiments on living animals. Likewise, Galen (129 - 199 / 217 AD), a Greek physician who practiced in Rome and was a giant in the history of medicine, conducted animal experiments to advance the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients." (Hajar, 2011)Animal experimentation saw a renaissance in the fifteenth century, but did not become widespread until the early 1800's. It did not take long after the widespread popularity of animal testing for people to come to the realization that animals had feelings and could most definitely feel pain, people have started debating over the issue of animal testing, and it has became a highly controversial topic and highly talked about topic. Many people argue, in particular animal rights groups such as PETA that it is downright immoral to test products of any kind on animals, while scientists believes that animal testing and experimentation has become without a doubt the only way we as people can discover many medical or other unique breakthroughs. "For example, primate use in animal experimentation led to the development of the rubella vaccine, the anti-rejection drug cyclosporin, and cornea, heart, and lung transplant techniques." (Allsbrook, 2008) I happen to stand on the side of having animals for testing. Animal experimentation has played a part in many major medical advances such as the ones mentioned above. Further examples include the development of antibiotics, vaccines, and surgical techniques. The animal experiments have also proved very valuable in the realm of psychology as well as they can observe the behavior of animals under a variety of conditions, such as stress, hunger, and loneliness, to learn how similar conditions might affect people as these are all emotions we suffer at some point of time in our lives. The food and cosmetic industry has probably garnered the largest amount of scrutiny. However, Food products and cosmetics are forever going to be a part of mainstream life for all of us and so the ability to test on animals so that we can avoid all possible harmful affects is a necessary task. Scientists have tested out food...

Find Another Essay On Testing on Animals: Wrong or Right

Abortion- Right or Wrong? Essay

904 words - 4 pages were revised, illegal abortions in Canada were alot more common. Women found themselves getting backroom abortions which were unsanitary and done byunskilled, incompetent people. They used air from bicycle pumps, coat hangers or knitting needles, they paid strangers a lot of money to do the procedure on their kitchen table or in a back alley. Many women decided to take matters into their own hands and over dosed on drugs, threw themselves down

Discrimination: Right or Wrong? Essay

1478 words - 6 pages everything was just fine. The blacks knowing that they were not going to be able to work or get service at business likes whites would be able to made them feel ruthless. Blacks were tired of being discriminate against and wanted it to change; this completely started the civil right movement in Oxford. The civil rights movement had just started and it led to the murder of Henry Marrow in the book “Blood Done Sign My Name”. Henry Marrow was

Disobedience Right or Wrong?

703 words - 3 pages . However, disobeying authority is sometimes the right thing to do as there is discrimination or the inclination of superiority of one's race. As illustrated in The Crucible and Montgomery Boycott people such as John Proctor, Reverend Hale, and Rosa Park, often rebel for just and appropriate reasons in order to improve society. John Proctor preserved his dignity as he refused to write down his name admitting he is a witch and not telling Danforth

Medical Testing on Animals

697 words - 3 pages strikes a person every 45 seconds.The Centers for Disease Control estimate that 70-80% of the commondiseases killing Americans are preventable given a responsible dietand lifestyle. Drug testing on animals is inaccurate and does notbenefit humans or animals at all. Animals including, but not limitedto, dogs, cats, mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, rhesusmonkeys, imported primates, owls, deer, sheep, llama, and cattle arecommonly used for

Testing Drugs On Animals

755 words - 3 pages Why are animals used as test subjects of medications that the human race will eventually rely on? The answer lies in all the advances that have arisen due to the ongoing testing. From these tests we have created cures for many diseases. However, these tests tend to be very unreliable in some areas. When testing Penicillin if we had just tested it in Guinea Pigs we most likely would have declared it a toxic drug.Medical testing on animals has

Genetic testing on animals

2111 words - 8 pages the public. It is true that scientists are constantly testing new drugs every day, and are always trying to find a cure for diseases. Now, if a scientist discovers or makes a cure for cancer, and it is tested and approved, then is it not in their moral obligation to promote and provide this drug for the public? Scientists are what the public depends on to help them out. So when something is discovered or prepared it is in the duty of the

Death Penalty, Right or Wrong?

735 words - 3 pages Death Penalty, Right or Wrong?Until recently I believed in the death penalty. I use to believe "an eye for an eye", if a person kills someone, they as the convicted murderer deserve to be killed. That is until investigators and DNA testing started to find flaws in the convictions of some death row inmates. That caused me to research what the death penalty truly meant to society. I found I was solely basing my opinion on media reports of murder

Beauty Pageants: Right or Wrong?

2016 words - 8 pages part in our life, because we are always judging on looks and not what’s on the inside. Media outlets are continuously on these topics, also. “Television is peppered with reality shows that feature pint-sized beauty queens decked out in pricy gowns, full make up, and big hair.” (psychologytoday.com) We are completely overexposed to what is wrong, rather than what is right. A childhood is something precious and should not be taken away from a

Capital Punishment: Right or Wrong?

2309 words - 9 pages Capital Punishment: Right or Wrong? All punishment is based on the same simple truth: there must be a penalty for wrongdoing. In order for there to be punishment, there must be both a wrongdoer and an authority to inflict the penalty. In a family, when you break a rule, the punishment is handed out by the parents. In society, punishment for crime is carried out by a criminal justice system (police, courts, and prisons). In both

Is Abortion Right or Wrong?

1373 words - 6 pages delivery so as to destroy offspring” (Dionisio). The National Abortion Federation defines it as “a medical abortion is one that is brought about by taking medications that will end a pregnancy, which ends a pregnancy by emptying the uterus (or womb) with special instruments” (Dionisio). Another example is The National Right to Life Organization’s definition: “any premature expulsion of a human fetus, whether naturally spontaneous, as in a

Immigration Laws: Wrong or Right?

1412 words - 6 pages argue that we have every right to monitor individuals here on visas. For example, "it is technically a federal misdemeanor for immigrants not to carry immigration papers, although the violation rarely called for a detention before September 11" (Ziglar, James W. 2005). In this light we can see that when an individual comes to the United States they are already agreeing to such conditions. The problem, however, is that the rules in place are not

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Wrong Or Right? Essay

2080 words - 8 pages Animals should not have to suffer for the sake of testing out new products or medicines. Many of the scientists and government officials agree, animal testing should cause minimal pain and suffering as possible, and that testing on animals should be done only when necessary. Pardue states that, "Replacement of animal tests, reduction in the number of animals used (currently some 20 million annually in the U.S.), and refinement of experimental

Animal Testing: Is It Right Or Wrong?

1609 words - 7 pages Animal Testing- Is it Right or Wrong? Everyday, people all around the world use facial products, receive vaccinations and take antibiotics or medications that have been previously tested on animals. Rarely people think about whether or not animals have been tortured to use the products that they are using, but simply only think of themselves and their own well-being. “An estimated 26 million animals are used each year in the United States for

Animal Testing: Right Or Wrong? Jeremy Bentham

1365 words - 5 pages irritation of the skin and eyes where chemicals are put on shaved skin or dropped into an animal’s eyes without any relief for the pain being caused to them. Also, a generally denounced lethal dose test is carried out on the lab animals where they are forced to ingest large amounts of a product’s chemical for scientists to conclude on what is the exact dose that can cause death for the people who buy the product. Animal testing should be banned

Avertising Right Or Wrong Essay

834 words - 3 pages for their product. Various government agencies set strict limits on what can and what cann!ot be done by the advertising industries. By realizing that advertising is the practice of one's First Amendment right, as well as knowing the rules for advertising, one can conclude that advertising does not promote racial disunity or racism.The purpose of the First Amendment is to allow American's the freedom to express how they feel; therefore, advertising