The Conventional Wisdom Says That, “Democracies Do Not Fight Each Other.” Apply Evidence On The Democratic Peace Theory To Explain This Argument.

1052 words - 5 pages

The democratic peace theory was not always seen as the substantial argument and significant contribution to the field of International Relations that it is today. Prior to the 1970’s, it was the realist and non-realist thought that took preeminence in political theoretical thinking. Though the democratic peace theory was first criticized for being inaccurate in its claim that democracy promotes peace and as such democracies do not conflict with each other, trends, statistical data, reports have suggested and proved that the democratic peace theory is in fact valid in its claim. Over the years having been refined, developed and amended, it is now most significant in explaining modern politics and it is easy to accept that there is indeed a lot of truth in the stance that democracy encourages peace. The democratic peace theory is a concept that largely influenced by the likes of Immanuel Kant, Wilson Woodrow and Thomas Paine.
The democratic peace theory stems from the generally optimistic liberal tradition which advocates that something can be done rectify the effects of an anarchical system, especially when it comes to war or conflict. For democratic peace theorists, the international system should be one in which there is cooperation and mutual benefits of the states are taken into consideration. The theory depends on liberal ideologies of civil liberties, democratic institutions and fairly elected governments and claims that liberal democracies are different from other systems of government as they do not conflict with other democracies due to the very nature of the liberal thinking and the pacifying role that democracy itself plays. According to the theory, the thought process behind democracies abstaining from war is that going to war would bring an end to peace which in turn would only bring damage against itself. Peace is the main priority and objective- the only way states are able to benefit politically and economically. As such it is maintain through negotiation and cordial relations. According to the democratic peace theory, liberal democracies would therefore only to go to war in order to restore their own liberty.
There are two ways of thinking about the democratic peace theory- the structural and normative. According to the structural perspective, liberal democracies are able to avoid war because of constraints on the decision makers. Leaders are not all-powerful or able to misuse their power, decisions to go to war are well thought out, have gone through due processing and measures and involves the opinion of the people. The structural perspective of the democratic peace theory takes into account the structures liberal democratic states have in place that prevent them from going to war with other liberal states such as checks and balances, accountability to the people, limits to terms in office, pluralism and competition. According to Russett, “In an economy of checks and balances, the division of power and the presence of...

Find Another Essay On The conventional wisdom says that, “Democracies do not fight each other.” Apply evidence on the democratic peace theory to explain this argument.

The broken windows theory and community policing and how they relate to each other

3038 words - 12 pages offensive manner" (Eck and Spelman, 1987, XVI-XVII). So problem solving involves bringing problems of the community to the right persons attention. Hopefully, by doing this, the problem will get resolved and not get worse or create other problems.The broken windows theory is an example of a tool used in problem solving. As I stated earlier, the broken windows theory suggests that an abandoned or non-maintained house or community will attract disorder

"The Idea Of Mutually Assured Destruction As A Reason For Superpowers Not To Attack Each Other"

655 words - 3 pages The basis for no nuclear strikes between the two superpowers was that there existed a psychology known as Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). This was the philosophy that both nations understood. They both knew that they held the power to destroy each other completely in the event of an attack. This struck fear in the hearts of both nations, causing little reaction to the current situation. This theory was based on three different ideas. One

The Broad Perspective: How do Climate and Economy Affect Each Other? Teacher LOVED this essay, very well researched and accurate

1084 words - 4 pages The Broad PerspectiveHow Do Climate and Economy Affect Each Other?North America along with other first world nations has now realized that as other nations aspire to develop along the same lines, serious implications on the ego-systems ability to sustain that type of growth will develop. With the end of the cold war and the demise of Marxist economies, capitalism is now the predominant economic system. Long associated with liberal democracy, it

Democratic Peace Theory, is it real?

1230 words - 5 pages and is best described by European nations, USA and Canada where it was argued that these countries were united by their liberal democratic political systems. This theory is also based on what was described as monadic. This is where democracies find peace in relation to the foreign policy irrespective of whether countries are democratic or not. This means that democracies are ever at peace with each other and engage in war against authoritarian

Essay On The Evidence That Supports The Theory Of Continental Drift And Plate Tectonics

783 words - 3 pages see whether they moved consistently in their predicted directions but this would be hard to prove as it would take hundreds of years to prove the continents truly were moving in consistent directions. It has though been measured that the continents do move a couple of centimetres each year and so far they have been moving in constant unchanging directions thus giving a good hint that this part of proof toward the theory is true.It had been known

How far do you agree that the Cold War was caused by an unnecessary fear and suspicion that each side had for the other?

726 words - 3 pages Eastern European nations would follow through with the Marshall Plan. Furthermore, this fear from both the United States and the Soviet Union was provoked by a misunderstanding of each other's policies; adding to the argument that their fears were illegitimate. This misunderstanding could have been solved with more diplomacy between both East and West, but it was their strong ideological clash that preventing this from occurring.In accessing the

“Each character in King Lear has control over their fate. The fate of each character is determined by the events that occur in act one of the play” - To what extent do you agree with this?

1006 words - 4 pages Chloe Stone"Each character in King Lear has control over their fate. The fate of each character is determined by the events that occur in act one of the play" - To what extent do you agree with this?Fate has proven to be a very important theme throughout many of Shakespeare's plays. In King Lear fate plays a particularly important role, as many critics would agree that the fate of each character is determined by events that occur in act one of

How does IR Theory explain the United Nation’s contribution to the maintenance of international peace and security?

2039 words - 9 pages How does IR Theory explain the United Nation’s contribution to the maintenance of international peace and security? “More than ever before in human history, we share a common destiny. We can master it only if we face it together. And that is why we have the United Nations.” (Annan: 2001) It is generally considered that international organisations ought to stand accountable for the preservation of global stability and peace, be this

Why do people marry?I believe that two people get married because they love each other. Our society today is in love with the idea of love. Almost

1081 words - 5 pages help each other out. The wife does not always make dinner and do the housework, the man does some and helps out at home. The husband and wife care for each other equally, and care and protect each other. Symbolic interactionists apply meanings through symbols, and in this case they apply symbols to marriage. An important part that allows one person to appreciate another’s opinion on a topic in role taking. We begin to role take through activities

An argument to support the view that "everything about the play [King Lear] hangs on the first two scenes not just the plot but the values as well."

1465 words - 6 pages which the tragedy begins.' (Shakespeare's MiddleTragedies, 171) In the first scene Lear, having realized that death is closingin on him, decides to divide his land between his daughters. This is one ofthe most pivotal points in the play as the effects of this action are enormous.Lear ends up casting aside Cordelia, who is the only daughter he has whotruly loves him, and gives all his land to his other two, power hungry,daughters. The other

The notion of 'Eurasia' and nationalism in Russia - do they cooperate or work against each other?

775 words - 4 pages In this memo I will try to argue that Russian nationalism (in either 'expansionist' or 'defensive' form) and the 'Eurasian' project do not enhance each other and cannot both be sustained at the same time in order to reach goals of both. While nationalism might help preserve the legitimacy of the Russian ruling elite in a short/medium term, in the long run it will have to decide. There are many reasons for the Russian elite to create the Eurasian

Similar Essays

Democratic Peace Theory Essay

2392 words - 10 pages is therefore not republican, it is the simplest thing in the world to go to war.” As others have eluded to, this argument implies a monadic democratic peace in which democracies are more restrained from using force overall(Rosato 2003). History shows, however, that democracies are only enhancing peacefulness in their relations with other democracies. Highlighted below are the micro-level implications of the adversary affects that impact on war

In "Weep Not, Child", Njoroge Says Confidently, "Sunshine Always Follows A Dark Night." To What Extent Do You Think The Novel Supports This Message Of Hope?

1039 words - 4 pages disagree with this statement, as I believe that this book does not reveal a hopeful message.Njoroge had faith in his education and his belief in religion motivated him throughout the beginnings of the novel. These are one of the largest sources of hope demonstrated in the story. However, I do not believe that his education exhibits a message of hope. He had hopes that education would allow him to excel and somehow save his country in the future. As a

To Do Or Not To Do, That Is The Question

553 words - 2 pages his soliloquies. He blames himself for not having the courage to act. When he hears of Fortinbras’s campaign for a patch of worthless land, it exemplifies how much of a coward Hamlet, himself, is. Fortinbras shows his courage by being willing to act for something huge but of little importance, while Hamlet, on the other hand, has much to revenge for and he cannot come up with the courage to do so. His frustration even causes him to

Science In The Renaissance: My Essay Talks About The Discoveries That Da Vinci And Galileo Made. I Compared And Contrasted Their Discoveries To Aristotlean Theory And Each Other

3319 words - 13 pages first solid piece of evidence that there were heavenly bodies that didn't orbit the Earth. By then Galileo's theories were irrefutable. What he concluded was not based on logical thought, but what he saw with his own eyes.Another thing he saw was spots on the moon. That observation made him think that the moon was imperfect and had properties similar to the Earth. He described the moon as full of mountains, valleys, and rivers. This observation