The Emancipation Of Congress Essay

1456 words - 6 pages

Our elected officials are sent to Washington to represent the people. In the case of the house they are there to represent the people of a certain district. Senators are supposed to represent citizens of a certain state. They currently have no limits on how long they can serve. There are many faces in Congress that have been there for over 20 years. I intend to explain why having the same people hold the same office is not healthy for the average American citizen. The original intent of the Constitution was to limit government and the self-serving interests that become tyrannical by their very nature. The fact that the founders did not include limiting terms for Congress appears to be a great oversight. The reason for this is simple. When a person was chosen to serve during the time of the founders it was considered both and honor and a burden. The founders overlooked term limits because at the time it was not an issue as it was not lucrative to be a member of Congress. Through devious legislation Congress has turned these offices of service into an institution that is above the very people it was designed to serve. It has become an institution that seeks power and allows corruption.
When one considers that the approval rate of Congress at any given time is below 30%, it would seem apparent that citizens are not happy with how they are represented. The question then becomes “Why are the same members of Congress elected if everyone is so unhappy with how they perform in their elected role”?

The Past
The very first Congress was given $6 per day for every day Congress was in session. This meager sum was further limited as they rarely held session for more than one third of any given year during that period of history. Members did not make holding office a career choice and usually only served one or two terms as the financial impact on them was usually negative. It was considered service to their country and the honor was in serving the people. After 1817 Congress voted themselves and annual salary of $1500 and in 1855 they were paid $3000 annually. Holding office was not a lucrative proposition and as such turnover was usually around 50% for members. That means that new incumbents were more likely to be elected. This rotation of members encouraged a representative to find the will of the people and campaign on policy that would help them be elected. Some will argue that this happens the same way today. I will explain in a later section why this is not the case and that the interest of the representatives is typically their own.
The offices held little incentive until the 1980’s where it broke 70k per year. The salary has since increased further to over 100k in 1991 and has since gone up by 4k on average every year since. This rate of growth encourages individuals to seek the security that is offered by holding office where there is a greater rate of growth and the private sector can provide.

In the most...

Find Another Essay On The Emancipation of Congress

The Triumph of the Congress of Vienna

1186 words - 5 pages The Congress of Vienna was a series of conferences held in Vienna, from 1814-1815. In which many European heads of government met to establish long-lasting piece, preventing revolution and any other nations from becoming to powerful, on the European continent after the defeat of Napoleon. Even though many countries came together to discus an issue, “the Congress of Vienna was more successful than many other peace meetings in history” (Beck, 241

Aims of the Congress of Vienna (815)

2722 words - 11 pages Many historians have come to regard the Congress of Vienna as a gathering of diplomats dancing and enjoying a great time in Austria. The famous quote "The Congress danced" is know by every historian. However the fruits of their actions taken in the Congress differ from this theory, as history teaches us.The congress of Vienna was the result of the end of the Napoleonic Wars and all the violence and conflict they had brought with it. It reflected

The Responsibilities of Congress and the President

1049 words - 4 pages In this module we have study modifications to the way Congress and the President do business. The Constitution lists specific duties for Congress to attend to; it is a little vaguer when assigning duties to the President. It is up to both of these institutions to best determine how to accomplish these duties. The major theme of this module is change, the addition of offices under the President and the modifications to the power distribution

The Position of Louisiana Before the Congress

1143 words - 5 pages across the globe, depend on crop production down here in Dixie. Therefore, the following proposals must be enacted by this Congress in order to secure the blessings of this country’s founding and ensure our success for generations to come. Firstly, the State of Louisiana urges this Congress to avoid reckless restrictions upon the existence and expansion of the peculiar institution, indeed this state’s right to succeed, without considering the

The Decline of Congress in Uttar Pradesh

1026 words - 5 pages of population, if Uttar Pradesh was an independent nation, it would be world’s fifth most populated country. Congress was once a dominant force in the state during the early years after independence but now the party’s dominance has been reduced to only a few seats in both the Lok Sabha as well as in the legislative assembly. THE DOMINANT YEARS: FROM INDEPENDENCE TO 1967 The Congress was the single-most

The Power and Significance of Congress

1838 words - 7 pages The Power and Significance of Congress Firstly it is important to look at the power and significance of congress as a legislative body. This includes the creation of law, and the scrutiny of the executive. Because the US federal system is ruled by 'separation of powers', it is important that the legislative - congress - acts as a good check and restraint on the executive - the president. The most significant power

The Decline of Congress in Uttar Pradesh

1510 words - 6 pages Congress won 48 seats from Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons behind this bad performance. To begin with, the death of Jawahar Lal Nehru and Lal Bahadur Shastri, two of the biggest Congress figures of that time had a major part to play in their decline. Moreover, both of them belonged to Uttar Pradesh and with them gone, the party had an internal crisis with both Morarji Desai and Indira Gandhi wanting to become the Prime Minister. The other

The Decline of Congress in Uttar Pradesh

1325 words - 6 pages country and a large chunk of the population was still in shock of the Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi. The opposition under the Janata Party decided to fight the elections together. They provided the people of the state and the country a unified alternative to the Congress party’s dominance in Indian politics. The Janata party was able to cash-in on the growing displeasure against Gandhi’s policies during the Emergency. In March 1977 when the Lok

The Vagueness of the Emancipation Act of 1834

1336 words - 5 pages The Vagueness of the Emancipation Act of 1834 The Emancipation Act of 1834 changed the course of history and the lives of many people in Great Britain and her colonies. However, despite its careful preparation by the British Parliament there were several flaws in the Act. The Act of Emancipation addressed many issues in order to bring about the much-desired abolition of slavery as smoothly as possible. The Act consisted of three

The Issues that Led to the Emancipation of Jews

1395 words - 6 pages The Issues that Led to the Emancipation of Jews The transition of Jews through history is one, which is complex and took place over a long period. There are many factors, which contributed to the change of the status of Jews within their world and changes in their status as well; these changes affected the religious and cultural values of European Jews, which lead to an alteration in their own perception, as well as

The Emancipation Proclamation: One of Abraham Lincoln's Greatest Achievements

1078 words - 4 pages Civil War itself. Today, Abraham Lincoln is generally known as a great president who took charge of a country in need and did many things that had a positive influence over the United States. One of Lincoln’s biggest achievements as president of the United States was the Emancipation Proclamation which freed slaves and “allowed black soldiers to fight for the Union” (PBS). Abraham Lincoln served as the sixteenth president of the United States

Similar Essays

The Powers Of Congress Essay

643 words - 3 pages The constitutional powers of Congress are enumerated in Article I. These include the power to appropriate money, authorize borrowing, levy taxes, regulate the currency, regulate interstate commerce, establish lower federal courts, maintain the armed forces, declare war, propose amendments to the Constitution, and (in what is called the "Necessary and Proper Clause" or the "Elastic Clause") "Make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for

The Emancipation Proclamation Of 1863 Essay

1860 words - 7 pages Was the emancipation proclamation more a military tactic rather than based-feelings towards the slaves? Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 during the civil war, as main goal to win the war. Some historians argued that it was based on feelings towards slaves because not only it freed slaves in the South; it was also a huge step for the real abolition of slavery in the United States. While other historians argued that it was

Lincoln's Emancipation Of The Slaves Essay

1671 words - 7 pages The "Emancipation Proclamation" speech was actually intended for most of the people that would free the slaves, not to the slaves. According to Carl Rollyson the Proclamation was not intended for the slave, blacks, or former slaves. The “Emancipation Proclamation” speech was during the Antislavery Movement or what some people call the Abolitionist Movement, during the 1860's. The main leaders of the abolitionist movement were Abraham Lincoln

Analysis Of The Emancipation Proclamation Speech

1643 words - 7 pages The "Emancipation Proclamation" speech was actually intended for most of the people that would free the slaves, not to the slaves. According to Rollyson the proclamation was not intended for the slave, blacks, or former slaves. The “Emancipation Proclamation” speech was during the Antislavery Movement or what some people call it the Abolitionist Movement, during the 1960's. The main leaders of the abolitionist movement were Abraham Lincoln and