The Machiavellian Struggle Essay

1020 words - 5 pages

The time of the reformation was a time of heavy politics, political wars, and religious attacks and conflicts. This was a period of growth for some countries, such as England, and a time of decline for other countries like Spain. These two particular countries, England and Spain, had two very powerful rulers who helped determine the fate of their nations. Phillip II of Spain was born into a very powerful family of extremely Machiavellian heritage. He had control of the Netherlands, Spain, parts of the North and South Americas, and parts of Asia and Brazil. He was also extremely Catholic and loyal to the Catholic Church. Queen Elizabeth I of England inherited a small country divided between Lutherans and Catholics, but she would turn out to be one of the greatest rulers of England in history. These two rulers would go head to head until their deaths, and while England rose up, Spain began to decline. Although Phillip II of Spain was a very Machiavellian ruler, Elizabeth I of England was much more Machiavellian, for Phillip of Spain was not governed by necessity, as Machiavelli advised; he was feared by his subjects, not loved; and Queen Elizabeth I of England was an effective ruler and near perfect example of the Machiavellian Prince.
Phillip, though a great ruler, did not allow his actions to be governed by necessity, but rather his religious ambitions. Phillip, "His Most Catholic Majesty," was very serious about religion. When the Dutch, within his empire, began to tolerate various forms of protestants, he became furious. In response, Phillip sent the Spanish Inquisition to the Netherlands to help enforce Catholic Beliefs, but it only drove more of the Dutch into the Protestant faiths. The nobles in the Netherlands even asked Phillip to for a break from the onslaught, but Phillip ignored it. Phillip has thus done the opposite of what Machiavelli recommended, that a prince should only take action when necessity and should leave religion out of the picture. With Phillip constantly trying to control the Dutch, they eventually rebelled under William the Silent, Dutch Duke of Orange. Even Elizabeth of England joined the Dutch cause, aiding them when possible. This conflict would eventually develop into a war which would set Spain on the road to decline. This failure to be governed by necessity, along with peoples fear of him without love, leads to the steady decline of Spain.
Though Phillip was feared by those whom he ruled, he wasn't loved by them, which lead to him being hated and his subjects resisting him. When the Dutch first showed signs of resistance, it was because Phillip had sent the Inquisition and, more importantly, tax collectors. Phillip did not offer the Dutch any substantial benefits, so they held no love for him, but Phillip did have heavy taxes which made the fairly independent Dutch increasingly resistant. The Dutch resistance and England giving assistance to the Dutch gave more reason for Phillip to send the...

Find Another Essay On The Machiavellian Struggle

Machiavelli’s The Prince: Examples of Machiavellian Leaders

2344 words - 9 pages Arguably, the most Machiavellian leader to ever exist would be Joseph Stalin. He abided by three major Machiavellian methods that were stated in the Prince: the ends justifies the means, crush any opposition, and displaying a false character. Stalin had a plan for Russia and did everything in his power to achieve that plan. He wanted to transform Russia into a industrial superpower, a military superpower, and a political superpower. To achieve


1728 words - 7 pages . (Robbins et al, 2004)Machiavellianism Machiavellianism, as a term, has been used to describe the principles of power politics, and the type of person who uses those principles in political or personal life is frequently described as a Machiavellian. (Robbins et al, 2004) The typical characteristics of a Machiavellian (Mach) include average or above average competence in theory of mind but an almost complete lack of empathy. Those who are considered

Iago: The Machiavellian Tactician in Othello

977 words - 4 pages Iago in Shakespeare's Othello is a dangerous manipulator looking to help himself with the downfall of others. He is what is known as a Machiavellian Tactician, or an individual who will do whatever it takes, to whoever it takes, in order to further himself, either in wealth or social standing. The first person's life which Iago is so willing to destroy is the gullible Roderigo. Iago likes to make his victims think that they are his best

A Man For All Season And Machiavelli's Doctrine: Reiteration Of History

1858 words - 7 pages ruler. From The Prince, Machiavelli was explaining how people struggle for power and authority. Machiavelli got the idea during the military scandal in 1499, from his first diplomatic mission to France (1500), and from his acquaintance with Cesare Borgia (1502). Machiavelli influenced the court of the king, and King Henry VIII himself during his reigning years, by using Machiavellian scheming. King Henry VIII made some compromise to public

Glorifying the Tudor Dynasty: Shakespeare’s Richard III and the Perfect Villain

1203 words - 5 pages dynasty. Firstly, Niccollo Machiavelli’s influences on England during the Elizabethan Era transmit in the plot of the play. Machiavelli, an Italian politician, published Il Principe, which established guidelines on how a prince could get and secure his power. Machiavellian ideas diffused among the political elite of England during Elizabeth’s reign (“The Influence of Machiavelli on Shakespeare”). Consequently, Shakespeare adapted these influences


872 words - 4 pages . Since the era of deregulation, government efforts to provide banking services to the poor have centered on mainstream banks. Policy makers have been unsuccessful to get the mainstream banks to loan to the poor. The banking framework homogenized as a result of deregulation and banks operating outside of the dominant banking model struggle to survive. After the collapse of the financial markets, few people today would advocate for the deregulation

Antony and Cleopatra essay

1359 words - 5 pages support, and Caesar seeking support in order to be ultimately crowned sole leader, eventually vying to demonstrate the Machiavellian approach to rule. Moreover, this is paralleled in the other two texts, in which Hitler eliminates any person who disagrees with him, and Napoleon gets rid of Snowball in order to gain full power over the animals. “At the meetings Snowball often won over the majority by his brilliant speeches, but napoleon was

Analysis of Act One of Othello by William Shakespeare

2238 words - 9 pages perceptibly subjugated to Iago's manipulation. Regardless, the inference is that Iago seeks to line his own coat so that he might be master, stressing the conditional nature of his Machiavellian 'vaulting ambition' by claiming that 'Were [he] the Moor, [he] would not be Iago'. Essentially, Iago is saying that a servant needs be cunning and devious only so long as his circumstances oblige him to struggle against subjugation

Adolf Hitler's Machiavellian Strategy

854 words - 3 pages Adolf Hitler's Machiavellian Strategy Machiavelli’s The Prince outlines tactics for a leader to seize and maintain lands under his power. His tactics have been demonstrated repeatedly throughout history, and though his approach is hardly ethical or idealistic, one cannot deny the fact that it has proved to be effective. Hitler is an example that exemplifies the accuracy of what Machiavelli said would bring success in the acquisition of

The Machiavellian Analysis of Politics

1834 words - 7 pages Written around 1513, Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince is arguably one of the most famous treatises on politics in history. Dedicated to Lorenzo de ’Medici, ruler of Florence at the time, The Prince was not published until five years after Machiavelli’s death in 1532. It contains Machiavelli’s well-known analysis of politics: all politics is characteristically defined as the struggle of acquiring and maintaining power. Within his analysis

Theme of Inhumanity Invades in Symbols

1304 words - 6 pages sympathy in their fragile state. But he refuses. He is a Machiavellian man who will always do what he must to achieve power despite the moral wrong that accompanies it. While teaching Darnay a lesson about maintaining power, the Marquis observes, “‘Repression is the only lasting philosophy. The dark deference of fear and slavery my friend,...will keep the dogs obedient to the whip, as long as this roof,’ looking up to it, ‘shuts out the sky

Similar Essays

Machiavelli And Gossip Girl Essay

1772 words - 8 pages dethrone the elitists of the Upper East Side. Dan Humphrey/Gossip Girl, the Machiavellian villain, creates the dependence that Machiavelli strives for in The Prince. The elite takes the bait from Gossip Girl and although they are in an ultimate struggle with each other, they still rely on Gossip Girl. An upper class character, Blair Waldorf, emphasizes this; “I might've posted something on Gossip Girl. All the girls do it. It's how we communicate

Comparison Of King Richard Iii And Looking For Richard

1603 words - 6 pages is presented through the quick progression of crosscuts, highlighting differing power levels of Anne and Richard. The meta film, such that Pacino possesses power and plays many different roles such as director, producer and actor, parallels Richard’s plethora of roles in the play, thus in this sense both texts elucidate Richards struggle in being engulfed by his Machiavellian nature. The use of chiaroscuro suggests Richards evil nature, and in

Richard Iii And Looking For Richard Connections

962 words - 4 pages To explore connections between texts is to heighten understanding of humanity’s progressing values and the underlying relevant themes that continue to engage societies regardless of context. William Shakespeare’s King Richard III (1592) (RIII) and Al Pacino’s docudrama Looking for Richard (1996) (LFR) demonstrate how opinion is created through comparative study, both explore the struggle for power within differing contexts to determine the

The Embodiment Of Machiavellian Ideals In Shakespeare's Hamlet

933 words - 4 pages Machiavelli's qualities for a successful Prince, Claudius is the embodiment of the most characteristics. His methods were dexterous, delusive, and strategic, and through them he displayed directness and practically in his struggle to maintain his political power. Although in the end Claudius fails in maintaining his throne against Hamlet's plot, his actions are such that he is clearly more an ideal Machiavellian Prince than Hamlet. In his conquest for vengeance, Hamlet proves himself to be an equal adversary in the art of deception, yet because he lacked the mark of a true Prince according to Machiavelli's standards, he too failed.