The Stuart Kings. Essay

884 words - 4 pages

England has been world-renowned for its long lines of monarchial ruling families throughout its rich history. However, kings from the Stuart line practically humiliated the dignity and grace that was the English crown. James I and his absolutist successors ran the English monarchy into the ground, but in the process, set the stage for the development of one of the most effective government systems ever.Elizabeth I's extraordinary reign was extremely successful because of her political flexibility, her impeccable management of finances, her manipulation of Parliament, her wise choice of ministers, and her sense of royal dignity. She was willing to do and sacrifice anything for her beloved motherland. Her Scottish cousin James Stuart succeeded her in 1603 as James I. With thirty-five years of political experience as king of Scotland, one would expect him to continue Elizabeth's royal majesty. Despite James' political shrewdness, he didn't feel the need in displaying the mystique of monarchy as Elizabeth. He also lacked the common touch, unwilling to become concerned about the needs of his people. James was the personification of an absolutist ruler. He believed in the divine right of kings. He thought he held total jurisdiction over the freedoms and properties of the English people. This theory contradicted the long English belief of life, liberty, and property. James I desired an extremely lavish court, and he treated the money of the country as his own pocketbook. He lived an extravagant lifestyle and cared for the necessities of no other than himself.James' son, Charles I, was as much as much an absolutist ruler as his father. Charles ruled without Parliament for the majority of his reign and financed his government by imposing measures that brought about political conflict. The House of Commons was England's representative body that questioned the actions of the Stuart kings. The House of Commons wanted a say in spending and state policies. But James and Charles thought this was against their notion of divine rule. James I and Charles I also appeared to be highly sympathetic to Catholicism. However, England was a predominantly Puritan country. The attitudes of this religion fit in with the economic practices of many Englishmen and especially, the members of the House of Commons. The Stuart kings' direct opposition to everything that the English people stood for reduced almost all respect for the English monarchy.The English civil war started in 1642 during Charles I's reign. The Scots revolted against Charles' sympathy for the Catholics. Also, the Irish Catholics rebelled because of the harsh rule and exploitation of the English governors sent to maintain Ireland. Charles could neither come to...

Find Another Essay On The Stuart Kings.

The Australian Outback Essay

1140 words - 5 pages map and let us go by car from Adelaide (Ort auf der Karte zeigen) through the heart of Australia to Darwin. We follow the Stuart Highway (Strecke zeigen). On this 3000 km we get an impression of the real outback.We leave Adelaide and after 600 km reach Pimba. In Pimba a very small town with 40 inhabitants we find one of these Outback-pubs, a bar full of earthy people. This place, which outback Australians call their hotel, is meeting point for

King james ii Essay

2149 words - 9 pages with the Exclusion Bill designed to remove James II totally from the succession to the throne. (8)The Exclusion Bill stated that Catholic Kings would not be permitted to rule Great Britain. Charles wanted to continue the Stuart Dynasty so he opposed and reinstated James in admiralty and the Council in 1682.(9) Life as the King Finally in February 1685 James became King upon his brother Charles II's death.(10) This was the beginning of a troubled

Books of Old Testament Summary

887 words - 4 pages recited a song to assemble the Israelites. Ultimately at the end of Deuteronomy we learn of Moses’ death. 1 Kings The book of 1 Kings is considered to be a historical narrative. Some of the key themes and purposes that were identified in 1 Kings were of how David’s fourth son was trying to set himself up as king. The prophet Nathan warned Bathshelba who ultimately warned David of this news. David chose Solomon to become the king rather than

Did mistakes by Parliament cause the English civil war?

871 words - 3 pages Catholic country. Like Charles himself; these advisors were profoundly unpopular in what at that time was Stuart England. Notable advisors of King Charles I include Thomas Wentworth, who was the Earl of Stafford, and George Villiers, who at that time was the Duke of Buckingham. Source 1 is a popular Stuart rhyme which many of Charles’s opponents sung at the beginning of his reign. The lyrics were “Who rules the country? The King. Who rules the

Where the word of a king is, there is power. Gives a history of the realtionship between Shakespeare and King James I

1004 words - 4 pages one of the greatest playwrights of all time, but Shakespeare was a businessman first and foremost. Macbeth is perhaps the greatest example of Shakespeare's ventures to please the boss guy. It also remains incomplete, which may be the most tragic part of Shakespeare's legacy.King James I was not always King James I. He was born James Charles Stuart on June 19, 1566 at Edinburg Castle in Scotland. His father, Lord Darnley, was murdered in early 1567

Absalom and Achitophel: John Dryden's Legitimate Yearning for an Absolute Monarch

2427 words - 10 pages As England’s Poet Laureate, John Dryden was expected to appeal to the current monarch’s best interest, and the steadiness of the Stuart dynasty was of utmost importance during the close of the 17th century. An overt propagandist for King Charles II, Dryden writes a disclaimer for his readers and acknowledges that, “he who draws his pen for one party must expect to make enemies of the other” (Damrosch 2077). The threat of instability within the

Western Civilization

990 words - 4 pages and 1649 absolutism ran along second to English beliefs. This is when costitutionalism began to rise. This was also during the English civil war. This was a messy period for England. After this period however, the English monarchy was restored. The Stuart kings were stored in 1660. This did not however, help religion of the relationship between king and parliament. The test was passed in 1673. This stated that those who joined the church of England


718 words - 3 pages father's death forced him to leave before getting a degree. In 1628, he was elected to Parliament. During the 1630's, Cromwell became a dedicated Puritan. Puritans were Protestants who strongly believed in the right of people to follow more simple forms of worship and church organization than those of the Church of England were. Rise to power. In 1629, King Charles I dismissed Parliament. He believed that kings got their right to rule from God, not

Historical Forces for the Free-Market - Itinerant Merchants

1461 words - 6 pages body of trade in the country, and it was one of the in which the Kings of England were particularly interested, for their customs revenues. Mostly their revenue is coming from wools and wools fells; when Kings wanted to borrow money it is to the merchants who they go to. Because of these reasons, and more, the Kings decided to fix staple towns, which acted as the centres of distribution, which the export trade was forced to go, and it was easier to

Politics in Aphra Behn's Oroonoko

2466 words - 10 pages she is more privileged then the slaves, because she is white, she is still powerless to prevent violence and change the course of events, despite her claims of authority. The issue of authority is closely related to that of the monarchy and absolutist power. One possible reading is that Oroonoko on a certain level might be seen as a symbol of Stuart kings and their fate: "the black prince has sometimes been read as a composite symbol for Stuart

The English Civil War

1258 words - 5 pages disputes starting with the first Stuart, James I, who took over the monarch of England after the death of the last Tudor, Elizabeth, and led on with more disputes with James I's son, Charles I and Parliament. Many other people contributed to the start of the Civil War. As a result to Charles and Parliament's incapability to collaborate on each other's terms, the English Civil War had now started, in 1642. The war lasted for seven years and finally

Similar Essays

Absolutism In The English Society In The Seventeenth Century

2443 words - 10 pages In the seventeenth century, there were several important factors that led the English to move from absolutism to a government in which the monarch had little power and Parliament had more power. The factors that led to this include the events during the reign of the Stuart kings, James I and Charles I; religious problems and diversity; and Oliver Cromwell's absolutist rule. James I, the founder of the Stuart line of English kings, was a firm

Divine Right Of Kings: What It Is

757 words - 3 pages thought for the people. They only thought of themselves. The first Stuart to rule England was James IV of Scotland. After becoming King he change his tittle to James I of England.The Divine Right of Kings in Shakespeare's Work Shakespeare's time (1564-1616) fell right into the time of Stuart rule, therefore the firm belief in the Divine Right had a lot of influence in his work. It is interesting to note that although Macbeth was an evil king, the

Mary Stuart Was A Good Queen In Scotland: How About England?

1530 words - 7 pages In the 1500s, many great Kings and Queen existed of whom a few will go down in history as some of the greatest leaders of all time. Elizabeth I being the queen of England during 1533-1603 and Mary Stuart ruling Scotland for the years of 1542-1567, Mary Stuart was always eager to take Elizabeth I’s spot, and she was always trying to find new ways to try to take the throne. Yet, if Mary Stuart was successful in taking the throne would she be a

Tudor And Stuart Courts Essay

2473 words - 10 pages symbol of sexual fluidity. Both the Tudor and Stuart courts used their dynastical brand to improve their individual image but this does somewhat dilute the importance of a collective representation. Nowhere is this more discernible than in the Tudor court image of Elizabeth where she rejects the appearance of fruitfulness in celebration for her celibate monarchical identity. However, her image remains as one of the most successfully recognised with