Warrantless Collection Is Warranted Essay

2538 words - 11 pages

Warrantless Collection is Warranted.
Antonius Douglas
Sam Houston State University

Law and Society
Professor Ferguson
April 20, 2014
Warrantless Collection is Warranted
One of the most controversial topics of conversation today may be that of warrantless collection of personal electronic communication data in the United States. As recently as April 1, 2014, the United States government acknowledged that it has collected the private communications of U.S. citizens, and that it has examined the data gathered when it believes it is necessary to detect and prevent a terrorist attack (“U.S. Confirms,” 2014). This and other revelations about the program over the past several years have resulted in loud and vigorous debates about whether it is appropriate in a democracy. Proponents, especially those in the government, tout the necessity of keeping citizens and the country safe. On the other side of the argument, opponents of the program make robust arguments against the collection of our communication data.
One line of reasoning that may be espoused by opponents is that the gathering of the information violates the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure, and similar arguments that challenge its legality. Other critics may opine that the intrusiveness is out of balance with the good that is actually done with the data being gathered. An analysis of the process, its legality, and the potential benefit to the American people is necessary to make an informed decision about whether the so-called warrantless surveillance program has value. When that is accomplished, it becomes clear that the program is legally defensible and provides real benefits to U.S. citizens.
Before analyzing the legality and value of the collection of communication data, it is important to understand to some degree the mechanics of the system. Harris gives an excellent summary of the nuts and bolts of the program in his National Journal article, “How Does the NSA Spy” (2006)? He relates that the National Security Agency gathers raw data in bulk from telecommunication companies, and then screens the portions identified as having a legal basis for analysis using ultra-sophisticated computer hardware and software to identify indicators that rate further examination by a human analyst (48-49). In theory, this initial scrub by the Novel Intelligence from Massive Data (NIMD) program (Harris, 48) makes an impossible task manageable by weeding out useless information and allowing human experts to analyze data that have the best chance of providing information that indicates a potential terrorist plot. For a large percentage of Americans whose data is collected and identified as being legal to analyze, then, no one is privy to their private communication.
Even so, Harris notes, the lion’s share of research and development dollars are spent on methods to gather and analyze data, and little money is spent on research regarding the...

Find Another Essay On Warrantless Collection is Warranted

Constitutionality of Drug testing Essay

1104 words - 4 pages school. If a student is tested with out a search warrant then that search is unlawful. The ACLU has been lobbying for a revisit of the 2002 Supreme Court case upholding warrantless drug testing on the grounds that the judges were partisan, and voting the way they were told to. One of the most fundamental aspects of American law is presumption of innocents this is also violated by drug testing. Drug testing "forces individuals to prove their

The Piracy of Privacy Essay

1031 words - 5 pages NSA and CIA employees. The US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has informed the public that a secret NSA rule change in 2011 now permits "back door" warrantless searches for domestic emails and phone calls. He has also notified that it has been used many times. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 which allows for the physical and electronic collection of foreign information between foreign nations and has included

No Such Agency

1735 words - 7 pages seizures. According to the Justice Department, “The Supreme Court has long held that the Fourth Amendment allows warrantless searches where 'special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement,' exist” (United States, U.S. Department of Justice 2). Another common falsely held belief is that the NSA’s terrorist surveillance program violates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) (United States, U.S. Department of Justice 3). The FISA

The National Security Agency

1687 words - 7 pages , and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Constitution). The first half of the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches seizures. The second half of the Fourth Amendment restricts when warrants can be served, but it never does state that a warrant is required for searches or seizures. According to the Justice Department, “The Supreme Court has long held that the Fourth Amendment allows warrantless searches where 'special needs

A Study of the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution

2377 words - 10 pages plenary authority to conduct routine searches and seizures at the border without probable cause or a warrant in order to regulate collection of duties and to prevent contraband from entering the country. This has been challenged on many occasions. However, the SC in 1985 noted that the Fourth Amendment's balance of reasonableness is qualitatively different at the international border that it is in the interior. The court commented, "These cases

Edward Snowden and Classified Files

2123 words - 9 pages has been collected may be abused since it might never be completely erased from databases or will not be properly protected. The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, or PCLOB, said that the legal statute that the NSA collection program was based on does not provide enough of a basis to support what it is doing. The board's decision was shared with President Obama before he gave his speech on the NSA's dealings, in which he said that the

Is it Appropriate to go Against the Government?

743 words - 3 pages the truth. The National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance program is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. Since 2006, the NSA has been “monitoring” technological communication between cell phones. They claim their intentions are to determine possible terrorists, but the NSA has been listening in on millions of innocent Americans. They have not provided warrants or reasons for monitoring the innocent. The Fourth Amendment states

Liberty Versus Security in Today’s World

748 words - 3 pages Inscribed in the stairwell of the Statue of Liberty is Benjamin Franklin’s quote, “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Recent reactions to terrorist attacks provide examples of our country beginning to mortgage freedom, and privacy under the mask of protection in times of crisis. Warrantless searches and seizures performed in the interest of national security are becoming

The Future of The Fourth Amendment Concerning Unmanned Aircraft

2889 words - 12 pages helicopter hovered at 400 feet and observing a greenhouse located in the backyard of the property. The court found that the warrantless observation was not a violation and was permissible because the defendant had no reasonable right to privacy due to frequent local aerial flights over the property. Also, the helicopter had clearance from the FAA to fly at 400 feet above ground level (AGL), which is standard flight level for helicopters. In

Search and seizure

1162 words - 5 pages triggered when courthouse errors lead police officers to mistakenly believe that they have a valid search warrant, because excluding the evidence would not deter police officers from violating the law in the future. (Greenhalgh)” Exigent circumstances is an exception that applies when there is danger in the vicinity of the public and the officer. Exigent circumstances are “[a]n exception to the general prohibition on a warrantless arrest or

Government Surveillance vs Personal Privacy

3663 words - 15 pages NSA’s former director of global digital data William Binney. Bamford states, “According to Binney, one of the deepest secrets of the Stellar Wind Program-again, never confirmed until now-was that the NSA gained warrantless access to AT&T’s vast trove of domestic and international billing records, detailed information about who called whom in the US…” (Bamford 9). This is the first time in history since the Watergate incident involving Nixon that the

Similar Essays

Government Surveillance Makes U.S. Citizens Uncomfortable

897 words - 4 pages The government’s use of surveillance and metadata collection has greatly increased since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Many Americans feel that this increase in surveillance is violating their privacy rights and the Constitution. The government can, and should, do everything it can to protect the lives and freedoms of its citizens. The National Security Agency is not violating the Constitution by electronically collecting

The National Security Agency And The Surveillance Scandal

1237 words - 5 pages surveillance data and privacy violations taking place throughout the U.S. and other parts of the country. The first program revealed was PRISM, which is a clandestine mass electronic surveillance data mining program. Launched in 2007 by the NSA, PRISM is a government code name for a data-collection effort known officially by the Signal Intelligence Activity Designator (SIGAD) US-984XN. The PRISM program collects stored internet communications made

An Analysis Of Cell Phone Technology, Security, And Individual Rights

1056 words - 4 pages of cell phone data tracking use. She suggests the government uses of warrantless wiretapping, and argues the communications companies and government have been involved in questionable activities (p1). Swartz and Allen question the government’s practices using cell phone data; Swartz sees the issue as practical is some cases, where Allen sees an overt violation of privacy. Both of the articles brought up two important questions. How do we define

Is It Proper To Place Someone In Jail For A Seatbelt Violation

1522 words - 6 pages injuries in North Carolina have been cut by 14 percent. Resulting in a savings of at least $135 million in health care related costs. Other positive effects of this program have been: reduced insurance cost statewide, the discovery of criminal offenders, and million of dollars have been given to local school districts from the collection of the fines.      When trying to determine whether or not it is proper to put